Carl Brooks, et al v. Phoenix Insurance Company, et al
| TERRI L. BROOKS and CARL W. BROOKS |
| PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY and KEVIN C. LOVITT |
| 19-3033 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Voluntary motion of appellants to dismiss appeal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 3 ][4][7039752] [19-3033] (PS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:39 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellant Carl W. Brooks to dismiss case. [3] [7039610] [19-3033] (Rock, Robert) [Entered: 10/28/2019 10:57 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/28/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7039760-2] [7039760] [19-3033] (PS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:50 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiffs-appellants shall file, on or before October 31, 2019, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7037450] [2] [7037450] [19-3033] (PS) [Entered: 10/17/2019 03:30 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/30/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/25/2019 for Carl W. Brooks and Terri L. Brooks. [1] [7037258] [19-3033] (VG) [Entered: 10/17/2019 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
