Christopher Stoller, et al v. Altisource Residential L.P., et al
| CHRISTOPHER STOLLER, Director and MICHAEL STOLLER |
| LESLIE ZIEVE, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee for ARLP Securitization Trust Series 2014-2, ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO and ALTISOURCE RESIDENTIAL L.P. |
| 19-3056 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [9] [7044276] [19-3056] (CAH) [Entered: 11/18/2019 08:23 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/25/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7044278-2] [7044278] [19-3056] (CAH) [Entered: 11/18/2019 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 8 Notice from the Supreme Court that a motion for extension of time to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari has been GRANTED, extending such time to 03/15/2020. [8] [7041603] [19-3056] (JR) [Entered: 11/05/2019 09:31 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: 1. Motion to dismiss appeal as duplicative and for lack of jurisdiction. 2. Motion to consolidate. [ # 5 ] [ # 6 ] The motion to dismiss is GRANTED. In this appeal, appellants Christopher and Michael Stoller challenge three orders issued by the district court. Two of the appealed orders were already the subject of appeal no. 19-2923, which this court summarily affirmed on October 24, 2019. The third appealed order construed the appellants motion to strike all pleadings as a response to the appellees motion to dismiss and denied the motion to strike. This is an interlocutory appeal over which this court does not have jurisdiction. Whitaker By Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1 Bd. of Educ., 858 F.3d 1034, 1043 (7th Cir. 2017). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to consolidate is DENIED as unnecessary. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge and Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge. [7] [7039453] [19-3056] (PS) [Entered: 10/25/2019 03:33 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellants Mr. Christopher Stoller and Michael Stoller to consolidate cases. [6] [7038541] [19-3056, 19-2923] (AG) [Entered: 10/22/2019 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellee Wilmington Trust to dismiss case. [5] [7038380] [19-3056] (Tumialan, Rosa) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rosa M Tumialan for Appellee Wilmington Trust. [4] [7038379] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-3056] (Tumialan, Rosa) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Leslie Zieve, per District Court docket and information sheet. [3] [7037827] [19-3056] (PS) [Entered: 10/18/2019 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Alsource Asset Management Corporation, John C. Steele, Zieve, Brodnac and Steele, Kim R. Lepore, Joseph Tirello, Nathaniel Brodnax, William C. Erbey, Stephen H. Gray, Mr. Smith, Bradley, Arant, Boult and Cummings LLP and Lawyers, Assignee & Agents, John Does, and Wilmington Trust, NA. [2] [7037823] [19-3056] (PS) [Entered: 10/18/2019 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/01/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/01/2019 for Appellants Christopher Stoller, Director and Michael Stoller. [1] [7037808] [19-3056] (PS) [Entered: 10/18/2019 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
