Michael Jones v. Salam Syed, et al
| MICHAEL JONES |
| JOHN DOE, Radiologist, SALAM SYED, Doctor, MEREDITH MASHAK, SYMPHONY DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES NO. 1, LLC, doing business as Mobilex USA and KARL M. HOFFMAN, Doctor |
| 19-3064 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Michael Jones leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/20/2019. District Court has assessed a $197.52 initial partial filing fee. [4] [7044976] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 12/17/2019. [19-3064] (CAH) [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 No attorney(s) added for Appellee John Doe, per District Court docket and information sheet. [3] [7038153] [19-3064] (MM) [Entered: 10/21/2019 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Nurse Jane Doe. [2] [7038147] [19-3064] (MM) [Entered: 10/21/2019 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Jones by 10/24/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 11/04/2019.. [1] [7038142] [19-3064] (MM) [Entered: 10/21/2019 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
