Dan Williams v. Board of Education of the City
| BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO |
| DAN WILLIAMS |
| 19-3152 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Williams v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Board of Education of the City of Chicago. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7048365] [19-3152] (Doyle, Thomas) [Entered: 12/06/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Deidre Baumann for Appellant Dan Williams. [7] [7046919] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-3152] (Baumann, Deidre) [Entered: 11/27/2019 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Dan Williams. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7046918] [19-3152] (Baumann, Deidre) [Entered: 11/27/2019 04:58 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/17/2020 for Dan Williams. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/18/2020 for Board of Education of the City of Chicago. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/10/2020 for Appellant Dan Williams. RJS [7044803] [19-3152] (MM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted in Room 1120, Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [4] [7044798] [19-3152] (MM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 03:00 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Dan Williams is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Dan Williams by 11/22/2019. [3] [7042537] [19-3152] (AD) [Entered: 11/08/2019 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas A. Doyle for Appellee Board of Education of the City of Chicago. [2] [7040995] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-3152]--[Edited 11/01/2019 by PS - to reflect the termination an addition of counsel.] (Doyle, Thomas) [Entered: 11/01/2019 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Dan Williams by 10/31/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 11/13/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/09/2019 for Dan Williams [1] [7040279] [19-3152] (CG) [Entered: 10/30/2019 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dan Williams v. Board of Education of the City | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen M. Gibbons |
| Represented By: | Thomas Arthur Doyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DAN WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Deidre Baumann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
