Brenda Mitze v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA MITZE
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 19-3212
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 31, 2020 Summary Mitze v. Saul

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 5 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 01/22/2020 for Brenda Mitze. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/21/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/13/2020 for Appellant Brenda Mitze. CMD [6] [7052108] [19-3212] (CG) [Entered: 12/26/2019 08:50 AM]
December 23, 2019 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Brenda Mitze to extend time to file appellant's brief. [5] [7052055] [19-3212] (CAH) [Entered: 12/23/2019 04:42 PM]
November 21, 2019 Filing 4 Attorney Jonathan H. Koenig for Andrew M. Saul in 19-3212, Rebecca Taibleson for Andrew M. Saul in 19-3212 terminated and added Attorney(s) Julie Loraine Bentz for party(s) Appellee Andrew M. Saul, in case 19-3212 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Julie L. Bentz for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [4] [7045459] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-3212]--[Edited 11/21/2019 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Bentz, Julie) [Entered: 11/21/2019 02:42 PM]
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The District Court granted plaintiffs request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on November 19, 2019. Accordingly, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/23/2019 for Brenda Mitze. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/22/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/12/2020 for Appellant Brenda Mitze. JR [7045325] [19-3212] (VG) [Entered: 11/21/2019 10:47 AM]
November 20, 2019 Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Brenda Mitze leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/19/2019. It appears from Plaintiffs affidavit of indigence that she lacks the financial resources to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, her motion, Dkt. No. 36, is granted and the filing fee is waived. [2] [7044930] [19-3212] (AP) [Entered: 11/20/2019 09:14 AM]
November 6, 2019 Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/20/2019. [1] [7042074] [19-3212] (MM) [Entered: 11/06/2019 02:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brenda Mitze v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRENDA MITZE
Represented By: Brenda Mitze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Rebecca Taibleson
Represented By: Jonathan H. Koenig
Represented By: Julie Loraine Bentz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?