Dontae Miller v. Mary Loftus, et al
MARY LOFTUS, QCC, JAILER LADIG, JAILER YAZEL and JAILER CRAWFORD |
DONTAE CRAIG MILLER |
19-3391 |
December 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[3][7059262] [19-3391] (DRS) [Entered: 01/29/2020 02:30 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 01/29/2020 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7059277-2] [7059277] [19-3391] (DRS) [Entered: 01/29/2020 02:38 PM] |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7047881] [19-3391] (AD) [Entered: 12/04/2019 03:53 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 12/18/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Dontae Craig Miller by 12/04/2019. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/03/2020. [1] [7047875] [19-3391] (AD) [Entered: 12/04/2019 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.