Christopher Young v. Tina Tomaras, et al
Defendant / Appellee: NURSE CARLY, NURSE LIZ, NURSE EDDIEE, M. HENZE and TINA TOMARAS
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER E. YOUNG
Case Number: 19-3445
Filed: December 16, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2020 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Christopher E. Young Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [9] [7055434] [19-3445] (DRS) [Entered: 01/10/2020 03:54 PM]
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the court's docket indicates that on December 30, 2019, the appellant filed his motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. However, the motion is incomplete because it does not include a PLRA memorandum in support. The appellant is reminded of his obligation to file the PLRA memorandum by January 17, 2020. (See the court's PLRA fee notice and order dated December 18, 2019.) Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without court action. The appellant may renew this request once his fee status has been determined. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1550 0757. [8] [7052874] CMD [19-3445] (AG) [Entered: 12/30/2019 02:34 PM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 Filed district court order dated 12/30/2019, The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Plaintiffs renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for attorney representation on this Courts docket because the documents were improperly submitted to the district court. [7] [7052768] [19-3445] (CM) [Entered: 12/30/2019 11:19 AM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher E. Young for appointment of counsel. [6] [7052766] [19-3445] (CM) [Entered: 12/30/2019 11:17 AM]
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Christopher E. Young to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7052762] [19-3445] (CM) [Entered: 12/30/2019 11:16 AM]
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Christopher E. Young leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/18/2019. [4] [7050970] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/17/2020. [19-3445] (CM) [Entered: 12/18/2019 01:19 PM]
December 16, 2019 Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7050388] [19-3445] (PS) [Entered: 12/16/2019 03:46 PM]
December 16, 2019 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Physician Assistant Williams. [2] [7050387] [19-3445] (PS) [Entered: 12/16/2019 03:46 PM]
December 16, 2019 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher E. Young by 12/19/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 12/30/2019. [1] [7050377] [19-3445] (PS) [Entered: 12/16/2019 03:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Young v. Tina Tomaras, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NURSE CARLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NURSE LIZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NURSE EDDIEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: M. HENZE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TINA TOMARAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER E. YOUNG
Represented By: Christopher E. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?