Earl Faber v. Randy Pfister
EARL FABER |
RANDY PFISTER |
19-3498 |
December 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Earl Faber. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7052979] [19-3498] (AG) [Entered: 12/30/2019 04:50 PM] |
Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Earl Faber for certificate of appealability. [2] [7052971] [19-3498] (AG) [Entered: 12/30/2019 04:38 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 11/25/2019. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 01/06/2020. [1] [7052008] [19-3498] (PS) [Entered: 12/23/2019 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Earl Faber v. Randy Pfister | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: EARL FABER | |
Represented By: | Earl Faber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: RANDY PFISTER | |
Represented By: | Michael M. Glick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.