Nancy Bailey v. OWCP
| NANCY BAILEY, on behalf of CHARLES BAILEY |
| OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Director, United States Department of Labor |
| 20-1075 |
| January 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order issued DENYING motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 28 days or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [ # 2 ] WLS [6] [7056390] [20-1075] (ER) [Entered: 01/15/2020 02:32 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jeffrey S. Goldberg for Respondent OWCP. [5] [7056092] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1075] (Goldberg, Jeffrey) [Entered: 01/14/2020 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas E. Johnson for Petitioner Nancy Bailey. [4] [7056052] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1075] (Johnson, Thomas) [Entered: 01/14/2020 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Petitioner Nancy Bailey. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7056048] [20-1075] (Johnson, Thomas) [Entered: 01/14/2020 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion filed by Petitioner Nancy Bailey to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7055949] [20-1075] (AP) [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Review docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). IFP pending in Appellate Court. Agency record or certified list due by 02/24/2020. [1] [7055941] [20-1075] (AP) [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.