Douglas Pearson v. Dr. Dwenger, et al
DR. PRIMEAU, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, DR. DWENGER, LIEUTENANT EWERS and DR. SIMMS |
DOUGLAS PEARSON, also known as PEARSON DOUGLAS |
20-1190 |
February 5, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 An order has been received from the District Court dated 02/12/2020, denying a certificate of appealability as unnecessary because a certificate of appealability is necessary only when certain types of habeas actions have been dismissed. [4] [7062265] [20-1190] (CMD) [Entered: 02/13/2020 01:38 PM] |
Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7060705] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-1190] (MM) [Entered: 02/06/2020 09:35 AM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: A. Ewers and BHS Fry. [2] [7060704] [20-1190] (MM) [Entered: 02/06/2020 09:34 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/06/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 02/19/2020. [1] [7060700] [20-1190] (MM) [Entered: 02/06/2020 09:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.