Donald Mains v. Andrew Saul
| DONALD L. MAINS |
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| 20-1362 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: The following is before the court: LETTER, filed on April 28, 2020, by the pro se appellant. It is unclear exactly what relief the appellant seeks in the letter. To the extent that the appellant would like this filing to serve as his opening brief, the request is DENIED. The brief is procedurally deficient and fails to comply with the courts rules. Accordingly, the court will take no action on the appellants letter. The clerk will send the appellant this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants, so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the court's expectations for briefs. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/15/2020 for Donald L. Mains. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/15/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/05/2020 for Appellant Donald L. Mains CMD [16] [7077800] [20-1362] (CG) [Entered: 04/29/2020 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Filed letter from Appellant Donald L. Mains. [15] [7077656] [20-1362] (DRS) [Entered: 04/29/2020 09:55 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: On consideration of the Status Report filed by appellee on April 8, 2020, this appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/01/2020 for Donald L. Mains. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/01/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/22/2020 for Appellant Donald L. Mains. DW [7073757] [20-1362] (CG) [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:30 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Filed status report by Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [13] [7073531] [20-1362] (Scoggins, Michael) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed letter from Appellant Donald L. Mains regarding Jessica Staples' statement. [12] [7072187] [20-1362] (CAH) [Entered: 04/01/2020 02:02 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: On consideration of Appellees Jurisdictional Memorandum filed on March 26, 2020, counsel for Appellee Andrew M. Saul are ordered to file a status report regarding the disposition of appellants Motion for Reconsideration. Status report due for Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security by 04/10/2020. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW. [11] [7071074] [20-1362] (FP) [Entered: 03/26/2020 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [10] [7070909] [20-1362] (Scoggins, Michael) [Entered: 03/26/2020 09:15 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: In light of appellant Donald Lee Mains failure to respond to the courts order of March 3, 2020, IT IS ORDERED that appellee file, on or before April 6, 2020, a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 3, 2020. DW [9] [7070580] [20-1362] (VG) [Entered: 03/24/2020 04:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: On March 19, 2020, the court received a letter, with attachments, from Jessica Staples on behalf of appellant Donald Mains. Because Jessica Staples is not an attorney, she cannot make filings on behalf of Donald. See Georgakis v. Illinois State Univ., 722 F.3d 1075 (7th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the court will take no action on the letter. CMD [8] [7070261] [20-1362] (CG) [Entered: 03/23/2020 04:04 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed letter from Appellant Donald L. Mains. [7] [7069702] [20-1362] (CMD) [Entered: 03/19/2020 05:26 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The following is before the court: LETTER , filed on March 13, 2020, by the pro se appellant. It is unclear exactly what relief the appellant seeks in the letter. To the extent that the appellant would like this filing to serve as his opening brief, IT IS ORDERED that the request is DENIED. The brief is procedurally deficient and fails to comply with the courts rules. Also, briefing in this appeal has been suspended pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue raised in the order dated March 3, 2020. Accordingly, the court will take no action on the appellants filing. The clerk will send the appellant this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants, so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the court's expectations for briefs, should this appeal proceed to briefing. CMD [6] [7069366] [20-1362] (CG) [Entered: 03/18/2020 03:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Donald L. Mains is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Donald L. Mains by 03/31/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7018 0360 0000 5171 5561. [5] [7069006] [20-1362] (AD) [Entered: 03/17/2020 12:44 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jason Scoggins for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [4] [7068633] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1362] (Scoggins, Michael) [Entered: 03/16/2020 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed letter from Appellant Donald L. Mains regarding tax information. [3] [7068444] [20-1362] (CM) [Entered: 03/13/2020 01:39 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: In the present case, plaintiff-appellant Donald Lee Mains filed a letter on February 25, 2020, within 28 days of entry of judgment on February 18, 2020. The district court treated that letter as a Motion for Reconsideration, meaning that it appears to be a timely Rule 59 motion. See Obriecht v. Raemisch, 517 F.3d 489, 493-94 (7th Cir. 2008); Borrero v. City of Chicago, 456 F.3d 698, 699 (7th Cir. 2006); Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343, 347 (7th Cir. 1986); see also Shales v. General Chauffeurs, Sales Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 330, 557 F.3d 746, 748 (7th Cir. 2009). As such, this appeal may be premature, because it appears that the district court has not disposed of the motion and entered its order on the district court's civil docket. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff-appellant Donald Lee Mains shall file, on or before March 18, 2020, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [2] [2] [7066265] [20-1362] (VG) [Entered: 03/03/2020 11:58 AM]
|
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Donald L. Mains by 03/09/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 03/16/2020. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/13/2020 for Donald L. Mains. [1] [7066192] [20-1362] (PS) [Entered: 03/03/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Donald Mains v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DONALD L. MAINS | |
| Represented By: | Donald L. Mains |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michael Jason Scoggins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
