Scherita L. Deloney v. Andrew M. Saul
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| SCHERITA L. DELONEY |
| 20-1418 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Scherita L. Deloney v. Andrew M. Saul |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief [ # 7 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 05/26/2020 for Scherita L. Deloney. Appellee's brief due on or before 06/25/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/16/2020 for Appellant Scherita L. Deloney. CMD [8] [7075875] [20-1418] (VG) [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:11 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Motion filed by Appellant Scherita L. Deloney to extend time to file Appellant's Opening Brief. [7] [7075781] [20-1418] (Richter, Matthew) [Entered: 04/20/2020 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Scherita L. Deloney. [6] [7072352] [20-1418] (Drohosky, Stacy) [Entered: 04/02/2020 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew Richter for Appellant Scherita L. Deloney. [5] [7071432] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1418] (Richter, Matthew) [Entered: 03/30/2020 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney David N. Mervis for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [4] [7069889] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1418] --[Edited 03/23/2020 by AP- to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Mervis, David) [Entered: 03/20/2020 01:49 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The District Court granted plaintiffs request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on 03/19/2020. Accordingly, briefing will now proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/27/2020 for Scherita L. Deloney. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/27/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/17/2020 for Appellant Scherita L. Deloney. JR [7069851] [20-1418] (MM) [Entered: 03/20/2020 12:22 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Scherita L. Deloney leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and the filing fee is waived. Date IFP granted: 03/19/2020. [2] [7069739] [20-1418]--[Text updated 03/20/2020 by JR.] (CM) [Entered: 03/20/2020 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/30/2020. [1] [7068731] [20-1418] (FP) [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Scherita L. Deloney v. Andrew M. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | David Michael Mansfield |
| Represented By: | David Mervis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SCHERITA L. DELONEY | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Richter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
