Peter Gakuba v. Larry Henderson, et al
PETER GAKUBA |
CHRIS GOTWAY, LARRY HENDERSON, Dietary Supervisor, Vienna CC, TERRY GRISSOM, Warden, Menard, KIMBERLY BIRCH, GRETA SMITH, Nurse Practitioner and PENNY GEORGE, Healthcare Director 2 |
20-1473 |
March 24, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 14 Prose motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [14] [7081171] [20-1473] (DRS) [Entered: 05/15/2020 09:31 AM] |
Filing 13 Filed notice of issues presented for Appellate review by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. [13] [7081169] [20-1473] (DRS) [Entered: 05/15/2020 09:28 AM] |
Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba for appointment of counsel. [12] [7080368] [20-1473] (CAH) [Entered: 05/12/2020 09:26 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed notice issues presented for Appellate review by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. [11] [7079462] [20-1473] (CM) [Entered: 05/07/2020 10:37 AM] |
|
|
Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to continue obligatory deadlines. [8] [7078095] [20-1473] (CM) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:09 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed district court order dated 04/30/2020, ORDER DENYING Motion for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Plaintiff. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir. 2007) (articulating factors court considers when evaluating motions for counsel). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to transmit the Motion to Continue Obligatory Deadlines to the Seventh Circuit. [7] [7078092] [20-1473] (CM) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:08 PM] |
Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellees Greta Smith and Kimberly Birch. [6] [7078085] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1473]--[Edited 04/30/2020 by ER - added Attorney Julie A. Teuscher to the docket] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:02 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed district court order dated 04/28/2020: ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER PAYMENT: The Court finds that Plaintiff is indigent and is unable to certify that this appeal is not taken in good faith. Accordingly, the Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(4). Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $505.00 filing and docketing fee is paid in full. [5] [7077959] [20-1473] (CAH) [Entered: 04/30/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/27/2020. [4] [7077197] [20-1473] (CM) [Entered: 04/27/2020 02:50 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. [3] [7073398] [20-1473] (PNR) [Entered: 04/07/2020 03:15 PM] |
Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7072729] [20-1473] (CAH) [Entered: 04/03/2020 03:02 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 04/07/2020. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Peter Gakuba by 03/31/2020. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/23/2020. [1] [7070571] [20-1473]--[Text updated 03/30/2020 by JR to remove deadline as ifp is pending in the district court.] (AD) [Entered: 03/24/2020 03:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.