Terri Payne v. De Anna Stacy, et al
| DAN MCDONALD, JOHN DOE, JON E. LITSCHER and DE ANNA STACY |
| TERRI PAYNE |
| 20-1509 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Filed Response by Appellees John Doe, Jon E. Litscher, Dan McDonald and De Anna Stacy Attorney Clayton P. Kaswki to a response to appellant Terri Paynes filings, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 31, 2020. [11][7081682] [20-1509] (Kawski, Clayton) [Entered: 05/18/2020 05:39 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: On consideration of the Memorandum Stating Why Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction and the Jurisdictional Memorandum, both filed by appellant Terri Payne on May 8, 2020, the appellees shall file, on or before May 18, 2020, a response to appellant Terri Paynes filings, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 31, 2020. DW [10] [7080193] [20-1509] (CG) [Entered: 05/11/2020 02:16 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed Showcause Response by Appellant Terri Payne as to why case should not be dismissed. [9][7079824] [20-1509] (CM) [Entered: 05/08/2020 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Terri Payne. [8] [7079821] [20-1509] (CM) [Entered: 05/08/2020 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Terri Payne. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7077621] [20-1509] (PNR) [Entered: 04/29/2020 08:47 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Terri Payne to show cause for her failure to respond to the courts order of March 31, 2020. Plaintiff- Appellant Terri Payne shall file her response on or before May 11, 2020. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of March 31, 2020, to appellants copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1550 1914. DW [6] [7077206] [20-1509] (CG) [Entered: 04/27/2020 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Attorney Katherine D. Spitz for De Anna Stacy, Dan McDonald and Jon E. Litscher in 20-1509 terminated and added Attorney(s) Clayton P. Kawski for party(s) Appellee Jon E. Litscher Appellee De Anna Stacy Appellee Dan McDonald, in case 20-1509 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Clayton P. Kawksi for Appellees Jon E. Litscher, Dan McDonald and De Anna Stacy. [5] [7076294] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1509]--[Edited 04/21/2020 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel. (Kawski, Clayton) [Entered: 04/21/2020 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Terri Payne leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/01/2020. [4] [7072196] [20-1509] (AP) [Entered: 04/01/2020 02:10 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant, on or before April 14, 2020, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order.(See order for further details) [7071800] DW [3] [7071800] [20-1509] (AP) [Entered: 03/31/2020 10:35 AM]
|
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee John Doe, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7071683] [20-1509] (AG) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/13/2020. [1] [7071676] [20-1509] (AG) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
