Rufus West v. John Kind, et al
CINDY O'DONNELL, BRADLEY HOMPE, ISAAC BUHLE, SCOTT ECKSTEIN, Warden and JOHN KIND, Security Director |
RUFUS WEST, also known as MUSLIM MANSA LUTALO IYAPO |
20-1570 |
April 8, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: The District Court has now received the $505 appellate filing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/15/2020 for Rufus West. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/13/2020 for Isaac Buhle, Scott Eckstein, Bradley Hompe, John Kind and Cindy O'Donnell. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/03/2020 for Appellant Rufus West [11] [7081000] [20-1570] (CM) [Entered: 05/14/2020 02:08 PM] |
Filing 10 FILED NOTICE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT THAT THE $505.00 APPELLATE FEE WAS RECEIVED. [10][7080837] [20-1570] (CM) [Entered: 05/13/2020 03:21 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Rufus West. [9] [7080551] [20-1570] (PNR) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:34 PM] |
Filing 8 ORDER re: 1. Motion to pay $505 out of release account. 2. Response to motion to pay $505 out of release account. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. The appellant shall pay the required docketing fee by June 3, 2020, or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). [ # 3 ]; Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1550 1969.; [8] [7078648] EBG [20-1570] (AP) [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:42 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed Response by Appellees Isaac Buhle, Scott Eckstein, Bradley Hompe, John Kind and Cindy O'Donnell Attorney Brian P. Keenan to Appellant's Motion to Pay $505.00 Fee Out of His Release Account. [7][7078118] [20-1570] (Keenan, Brian) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:35 PM] |
Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Brian P. Keenan for Appellees Isaac Buhle, Scott Eckstein, Bradley Hompe, John Kind and Cindy O'Donnell. [6] [7078034] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1570]-[Edited 04/30/2020 by VG - to reflect termination and addition of counsel] (Keenan, Brian) [Entered: 04/30/2020 12:42 PM] |
Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Rufus West. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7077582] [20-1570] (PNR) [Entered: 04/28/2020 04:09 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: Filed clerk's notice to Appellees Isaac Buhle, Scott Eckstein, Bradley Hompe and John Kind to file a response to MOTION TO PAY $505.00 FEE OUT OF RELEASE ACCOUNT. Response due for Appellees Isaac Buhle, Scott Eckstein, Bradley Hompe, John Kind and Cindy O'Donnell by 05/01/2020. [4] [7075727] [20-1570] (ER) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:19 PM] |
Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Rufus West to pay $505.00 fee out of his release account. [3] [7075201] [20-1570] (MAN) [Entered: 04/15/2020 02:59 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/22/2020. [2][7073560] [20-1570] (MM) [Entered: 04/08/2020 12:06 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Rufus West by 04/15/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 04/22/2020. [1] [7073556] [20-1570] (MM) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.