Carissa Smith v. Village of Downers Grove, et al
| SHANNON GILLETTE, KURT BLUDER, DAVID FIELDMAN and VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE |
| CARISSA SMITH |
| 20-1613 |
| April 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney CHRISTOPHER COOPER for Appellant Carissa Smith. [5] [7077204] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1613] (Cooper, Christopher) [Entered: 04/27/2020 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Carissa Smith. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7076758] [20-1613] (Cooper, Christopher) [Entered: 04/23/2020 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney John B. Murphey for Appellees Village of Downers Grove, Shannon Gillette, David Fieldman and Kurt Bluder. [3] [7075646] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1613] (Murphey, John) [Entered: 04/17/2020 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Carissa Smith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/15/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/15/2020 for Appellant Carissa Smith. [7075131] [2] [7075131] [20-1613] (VG) [Entered: 04/15/2020 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Carissa Smith by 04/21/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 04/28/2020. [1] [7075047] [20-1613] (AP) [Entered: 04/15/2020 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
