Stephen Cassell, et al v. David Snyders, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CRAIG BEINTEMA, STEVE SCHAIBLE, Chief of Police of the Village of Lena, Illinois, JAY R. PRITZKER and DAVID SNYDERS, Sheriff of Stephenson County, Illinois
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN CASSELL and BELOVED CHURCH, an Illinois Not-for-Profit Corporation
Case Number: 20-1757
Filed: May 6, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 8, 2021 Summary Cassell v. Snyders

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Filing 19 Reply Motion filed by Appellants Stephen Cassell and Beloved Church in support of their motion to vacate the district court's preliminary injunction order as moot and to dismiss this interlocutory appeal. [19] [7090104] [20-1757]--[Edited 06/30/2020 by AD to reflect proper document filed.] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 06/29/2020 11:26 PM]
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER re: 1. Plaintiffs'-Appellants' Rule 42(b) Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order as Moot and Dismiss This Interlocutory Appeal. 2. Defendant Steve Schaible's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injuction Order as Moot and Dismiss Their Interlocutory Appeal. 3. Defendants-Appellees David Snyders and Craig Beintema's Response to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Rule 42(b) Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order as Moot and Dismiss This Interlocutory Appeal. 4. Response of Defendant-Appellee Governor J.B. Pritzker to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Rule 42(b) Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order as Moot and Dismiss This Interlocutory Appeal. The appellants shall file a reply by 06/29/2020. SCR [18] [7088597] [20-1757] (MM) [Entered: 06/22/2020 04:36 PM]
June 19, 2020 Filing 17 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellee Jay R. Pritzker Attorney Priyanka Gupta to Appellant's Rule 42(b) motion to dismiss interlocutory appeal and vacate district court's preliminary injunction order as moot. [17][7088129] [20-1757] (Gupta, Priyanka) [Entered: 06/19/2020 12:42 PM]
June 19, 2020 Filing 16 Filed Response by Appellees David Snyders and Craig Beintema to Response to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Rule 42(b) Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order As Moot And Dismiss This Interlocutory Appeal. [16][7088082] [20-1757] (Jacobi, Benjamin) [Entered: 06/19/2020 10:48 AM]
June 18, 2020 Filing 15 Filed Response by Appellee Steve Schaible to Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order as Moot and Dismiss their Interlocutory Appeal. [15][7087883] [20-1757] (Turiello, Jennifer) [Entered: 06/18/2020 03:11 PM]
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: Plaintiffs'-Appellants' Rule 42(b) Motion to Vacate the District Court's Preliminary Injunction Order as Moot and Dismiss This Interlocutory Appeal. The appellees shall file a response to the motion by 06/19/2020. SCR [14] [7085747] [20-1757] (MM) [Entered: 06/08/2020 03:16 PM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 13 Motion filed by Appellants Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell To vacate the district court's preliminary injunction order as moot and dismiss interlocutory appeal. [13] [7085488] [20-1757] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 06/05/2020 03:35 PM]
May 11, 2020 Filing 12 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [12] [7079949] [20-1757] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 05/11/2020 07:07 AM]
May 7, 2020 Filing 11 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Kevin M. Casey for Appellee Steve Schaible. [11] [7079519] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by FP to reflect that atty. Casey is added to the docket.] (Turiello, Jennifer) [Entered: 05/07/2020 11:53 AM]
May 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7079472] [10] [7079472] [20-1757] (CG) [Entered: 05/07/2020 10:48 AM]
May 7, 2020 Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Martin Whittaker for Appellants Stephen Cassell and Beloved Church. [9] [7079398] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:49 AM]
May 7, 2020 Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas Brejcha for Appellants Stephen Cassell and Beloved Church. [8] [7079396] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:46 AM]
May 7, 2020 Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Peter Breen for Appellants Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell. [7] [7079394] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Whittaker, Martin) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:39 AM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearances filed by Attorney Paul O'Grady, Dominick L. Lanzito, Jennifer L. Turiello for Appellee Steve Schaible. [6] [7079383] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Turiello, Jennifer) [Entered: 05/06/2020 06:48 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Karen L. McNaught for Appellees Craig Beintema and David Snyders. [5] [7079354] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (McNaught, Karen) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:24 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Terence J. Corrigan for Appellees Craig Beintema and David Snyders. [4] [7079351] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Corrigan, Terence) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:21 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Benjamin M. Jacobi for Appellees Craig Beintema and David Snyders. [3] [7079350] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1757] (Jacobi, Benjamin) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:17 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney Priyanka Gupta for Appellee Jay R. Pritzker. [2] [7079328] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1757]--[Edited 05/07/2020 by MM to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Gupta, Priyanka) [Entered: 05/06/2020 03:52 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/15/2020 for Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell. Transcript information sheet due by 05/20/2020. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell by 05/11/2020. [1] [7079304] [20-1757] (VG) [Entered: 05/06/2020 03:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Cassell, et al v. David Snyders, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CRAIG BEINTEMA
Represented By: Karen L. McNaught
Represented By: Benjamin M. Jacobi
Represented By: Terence J. Corrigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVE SCHAIBLE, Chief of Police of the Village of Lena, Illinois
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Jennifer L. Turiello
Represented By: Paul O'Grady
Represented By: Kevin M. Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAY R. PRITZKER
Represented By: Priyanka Gupta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SNYDERS, Sheriff of Stephenson County, Illinois
Represented By: Karen L. McNaught
Represented By: Benjamin M. Jacobi
Represented By: Terence J. Corrigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STEPHEN CASSELL
Represented By: Peter Breen
Represented By: Thomas L. Brejcha Jr.
Represented By: Martin Whittaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BELOVED CHURCH, an Illinois Not-for-Profit Corporation
Represented By: Peter Breen
Represented By: Thomas L. Brejcha Jr.
Represented By: Martin Whittaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?