Timothy Bell v. Shan Jumper
| TIMOTHY BELL |
| SHAN JUMPER |
| 20-1838 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Timothy Bell to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7090967] [20-1838] (CM) [Entered: 07/02/2020 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Timothy Bell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7087900] [20-1838] (CM) [Entered: 06/18/2020 03:37 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER re: Renewed Motion to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis. To the extent that the appellant seeks leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, his paperwork is incomplete because it does not include an asset affidavit. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required asset affidavit by July 17, 2020. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [8] [7087677] [20-1838] (AD) [Entered: 06/17/2020 03:06 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Timothy Bell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7087225] [20-1838] (PNR) [Entered: 06/16/2020 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Timothy Bell to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7087203] [20-1838] (CAH) [Entered: 06/16/2020 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Timothy Bell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7087067] [20-1838] (AD) [Entered: 06/15/2020 02:51 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant Timothy Bell is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Timothy Bell by 06/24/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6079 9153. [4] [7086193] [20-1838] (AD) [Entered: 06/10/2020 11:19 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Timothy Bell leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/22/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/25/2020 for Appellant Timothy Bell [7082924] [3] [7082924] [20-1838] (VG) [Entered: 05/26/2020 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7081862] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-1838] (ER) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Timothy Bell by 05/26/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 06/02/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/02/2020 for Appellant Timothy Bell. [1] [7081856] [20-1838] (ER) [Entered: 05/19/2020 12:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Timothy Bell v. Shan Jumper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: TIMOTHY BELL | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SHAN JUMPER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
