Michael Hughes v. Mark Wolfe
Defendant / Appellee: MARK WOLFE
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL T. HUGHES
Case Number: 20-1910
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2020 Filing 9 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [9] [7094005] [20-1910] (PNR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 09:59 AM]
July 16, 2020 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/24/2020 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7094016-2] [7094016] [20-1910] (PNR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:11 AM]
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: On May 1, 2020, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court's final order and judgment, and appeal no. 20-1909 was opened. Later that day the appellant filed an amended notice of appeal from the same order and judgment, and a second appeal, 20-1910, was opened. Both filings seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appeal no. 20-1910 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 20-1910 shall be imposed. [8] [7089118] [20-1909, 20-1910] (AP) [Entered: 06/24/2020 03:04 PM]
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Rule 1 Motion for Joinder of Appeal. [ # 6 ] On April 15, 2020, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court's judgment in 18-cv-6139, and appeal no. 20-1635 was opened. On May 18, 2020, the appellant filed an amended notice of appeal in the same case, and a second appeal, 20-1873, was opened. Both filings seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, the appellants request for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED to the extent that appeal no. 20-1873 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 20-1873 shall be imposed. Further, the appellants request to consolidate is DENIED without prejudice to renewal after the appellant's fee status has been determined in any appeal he wishes to consolidate. [7] [7087813] [20-1635, 20-1873, 20-1909, 20-1910, 20-1917] (AD) [Entered: 06/18/2020 11:13 AM]
June 12, 2020 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Michael T. Hughes leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/12/2020. [5] [7086720] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 07/13/2020 [20-1910] (CM) [Entered: 06/12/2020 01:04 PM]
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re: Document titled "Transmission of Record," filed on 06/09/2020, by the pro se Appellant. The district court no longer transmits the record on appeal to this court. Because the record is electronic, it is available for this court's use without the need for transmission of a physical record. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant would like the district court to transmit the record in these appeals, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. The appellant is reminded that, pursuant to Circuit Rule 10(a)(3), he must ensure that all electronic and non-electronic documents necessary for review on appeal are on the district court docket. The appellant is further reminded that if he would like to correct or supplement the record on appeal, he should make that request in the district court. See Circuit Rule 10(b). CMD [4] [7086293] [20-1635, 20-1873, 20-1909, 20-1910, 20-1917, 20-1924] (MM) [Entered: 06/10/2020 03:25 PM]
June 9, 2020 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael T. Hughes to consolidate cases. [6] [7085850] [20-1635, 20-1873, 20-1909, 20-1910, 20-1917] (CM) [Entered: 06/09/2020 09:53 AM]
June 9, 2020 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael T. Hughes for transmission of record. [3] [7085856] [20-1910] (CM) [Entered: 06/09/2020 09:55 AM]
June 9, 2020 Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant Michael T. Hughes to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7085854] [20-1910] (CM) [Entered: 06/09/2020 09:54 AM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael T. Hughes by 05/08/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 06/12/2020.. [1] [7084270] [20-1910] (AP) [Entered: 06/01/2020 10:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Hughes v. Mark Wolfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK WOLFE
Represented By: Danielle Mikhail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL T. HUGHES
Represented By: Michael T. Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?