Kevin Martin v. Warden of Wabash Valley Correc
| WARDEN OF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| KEVIN L. MARTIN |
| 20-1914 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED because it is unnecessary. (See order for details). Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge and Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge. [8] [7095851] [20-1914] (AP) [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:32 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed notice by Appellant Kevin L. Martin in 20-1518, 20-1722, 20-1914. [7] [7091337] [20-1518, 20-1722, 20-1914] (CM) [Entered: 07/06/2020 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed declaration in support of motion to proceed informa pauperis by Appellant Kevin L. Martin. [6] [7090607] [20-1914] (DRS) [Entered: 07/01/2020 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin L. Martin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7090345] [20-1914] (CM) [Entered: 06/30/2020 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Kevin L. Martin leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/16/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/17/2020 for Appellant Kevin L. Martin [7087518] [4] [7087518] [20-1914] (CG) [Entered: 06/17/2020 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin L. Martin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7087260] [20-1914] (MAN) [Entered: 06/16/2020 10:34 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that this appeal is unnecessary. Appellant seeks review of the district court's order denying the reconsideration of an order denying the issuance of a certificate of appealability. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) directs that an appellant should re-file his request for the issuance of a certificate of appealability in the merits appeals (Nos. 20-1518 and 20-1722); it is not necessary to file a separate appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant file, on or before June 19, 2020, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7085574][2] [2] [7085574] [20-1914] (AP) [Entered: 06/08/2020 09:03 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 05/29/2020. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 06/15/2020. [1] [7084342] [20-1914] (ER) [Entered: 06/01/2020 02:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kevin Martin v. Warden of Wabash Valley Correc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN OF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: KEVIN L. MARTIN | |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
