Kim Lee Millbrook v. Michael M. Mihm
KIM LEE MILLBROOK |
MICHAEL M. MIHM |
20-2180 |
July 2, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER: The petitions for writ of mandamus are DENIED. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Amy C. Barrett, Circuit Judge. [2] [7092452] [20-2180, 20-2186] (AP) [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:49 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/09/2020 Final Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7092460-2] [7092460] [20-2180, 20-2186] (AP) [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:56 PM] |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/16/2020 for Petitioner Kim Lee Millbrook [1] [7091067] [20-2180] (CG) [Entered: 07/06/2020 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kim Lee Millbrook v. Michael M. Mihm | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KIM LEE MILLBROOK | |
Represented By: | Kim Lee Millbrook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MICHAEL M. MIHM | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.