Walter Brzowski v. Unsettled Legal Federal Remova
WALTER J. BRZOWSKI |
UNSETTLED LEGAL FEDERAL REMOVAL ISSUES |
20-2182 |
July 6, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Order issued DENYING petition for leave for change of Fed. Appellate venue review. [ # 9 ] TDK [10] [7104485] [20-2182] (ZNS) [Entered: 08/31/2020 09:57 AM] |
Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Walter J. Brzowski for leave for change federal appellate venue review. [9] [7102497] [20-2182] (CAH) [Entered: 08/20/2020 04:20 PM] |
Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Walter J. Brzowski to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7101704] [20-2182] (CAH) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:29 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER re: Reply Response-Inquiry, filed on 07/30/2020, by the pro se appellant. To the extent that the appellant would like this court to review the district courts denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, his paperwork is incomplete because it does not include an asset affidavit. The appellant is reminded that he must file an asset affidavit by 08/24/2020. (See the courts Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice dated July 24, 2020.) The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [7] [7097607] [20-2182] (MM) [Entered: 07/31/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed letter from Appellant Walter J. Brzowski regarding fee status. [6] [7097480] [20-2182] (CM) [Entered: 07/30/2020 04:12 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Walter J. Brzowski leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/23/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/24/2020 for Appellant Walter J. Brzowski [7096092] [5] [7096092] [20-2182] (CG) [Entered: 07/24/2020 02:08 PM] |
Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7094357] [20-2182] (AP) [Entered: 07/17/2020 02:10 PM] |
Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Walter J. Brzowski. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7093587] [20-2182] (PNR) [Entered: 07/14/2020 05:16 PM] |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7091178] [20-2182] (ER) [Entered: 07/06/2020 01:04 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Walter J. Brzowski by 07/13/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 07/20/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/20/2020 for Appellant Walter J. Brzowski [1] [7091177] [20-2182] (ER) [Entered: 07/06/2020 12:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Walter Brzowski v. Unsettled Legal Federal Remova | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: WALTER J. BRZOWSKI | |
Represented By: | Walter J. Brzowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNSETTLED LEGAL FEDERAL REMOVAL ISSUES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.