Chadd Morris v. Gregg Scott, et al
| MICHAEL KERR, GARY KULHAN, ERIC KUNKEL, GERALD CARREON, SHAN JUMPER, CURTIS PARSONS and GREGG SCOTT |
| CHADD A. MORRIS |
| 20-2217 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Chadd Morris v. Gregg Scott |
| Chadd Morris v. Gregg Scott |
| Chadd Morris v. Gregg Scott |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion to give judical notice and motion for extension of time. Because it is unclear exactly what relief the appellant seeks, the motion will be filed without court action. The appellant is reminded that he must file a response to the courts order dated August 24, 2020, by no later than September 9, 2020. The clerk will send the appellant a copy of the public docket and a copy of the courts order dated August 24, 2020. CMD [11] [7104947] [20-2217] (ER) [Entered: 09/01/2020 03:02 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Chadd A. Morris to take judicial notice and for extension of time. [10] [7104653] [20-2217] (CAH) [Entered: 08/31/2020 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed letter from Appellant Chadd A. Morris. [9] [7104649] [20-2217] (CAH) [Entered: 08/31/2020 03:43 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: On consideration of the Motion for Clarification filed by appellant Chadd A. Morris on 08/20/2020, appellant Chadd A. Morris file, on or before 09/09/2020, a status report regarding the disposition of the Motion for Reconsideration that was filed in the district court on 06/19/2020. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [8] [7103149] [20-2217] (MM) [Entered: 08/24/2020 04:14 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Chadd A. Morris for clarification. [7] [7102499] [20-2217] (CAH) [Entered: 08/20/2020 04:22 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Chadd A. Morris shall show cause for failure to respond to the court's order of 7/9/20. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Chadd A. Morris by 08/25/2020. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the court's order of 7/9/20 to appellant's copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019014000060803324. DW [6] [7100286] [20-2217] (ER) [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:02 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Chadd A. Morris to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7093211] [20-2217] (CAH) [Entered: 07/13/2020 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Chadd A. Morris. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7093194] [20-2217] (PNR) [Entered: 07/13/2020 04:22 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant(s) shall file a jurisdictional memorandum staying why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [3] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Chadd A. Morris by 07/23/2020 [3] [7092427] [20-2217] (ER) [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:10 PM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7092094] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-2217] (AP) [Entered: 07/08/2020 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/22/2020. [1] [7092090] [20-2217] (AP) [Entered: 07/08/2020 03:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
