Niki DaSilva, et al v. State of Indiana, et al
| INDIANA SENATE and INDIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
| SAMANTHA LOZANO, MARA REARDON, GABRIELLE MCLEMORE and NIKI DASILVA |
| CURTIS T. HILL, JR., individually and in his capacity as the Indiana Attorney General and STATE OF INDIANA |
| 20-2238 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mr. Geoffrey G. Giorgi for Appellee Curtis T. Hill, Jr. has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [10] [7100531] [20-2238] (LJ) [Entered: 08/12/2020 02:59 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. [9] JNS [7097765] [20-2238] (AD) [Entered: 07/31/2020 03:08 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Geoffrey Giorgi for Appellee Curtis T. Hill, Jr.. [8] [7097435] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2238] (Giorgi, Geoffrey) [Entered: 07/30/2020 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon. [7] [7096157] [20-2238] (ER) [Entered: 07/24/2020 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon. [6] [7096110] [20-2238] (Jeselskis, Kimberly) [Entered: 07/24/2020 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Kimberly D. Jeselskis for Appellants Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon. [5] [7096108] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2238] (Jeselskis, Kimberly) [Entered: 07/24/2020 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Aaron T. Craft for Appellees Curtis T. Hill, Jr., in his official capacity as Indiana Attorney General, and the State of Indiana. [4] [7095594] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No)--[Edited 07/23/2020 by ZNS to reflect the addition of counsel & by JD to reflect Hill in his official capacity] (Craft, Aaron) [Entered: 07/23/2020 07:27 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/31/2020 for Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon. Appellee's brief due on or before 09/30/2020 for Curtis T. Hill Jr. and State of Indiana. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/21/2020 for Appellants Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon JNS [7094267] [20-2238] (AP) [Entered: 07/17/2020 10:30 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [2] [7094264] [20-2238] (AP) [Entered: 07/17/2020 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/24/2020. Appellants' brief due on or before 08/19/2020 for Niki DaSilva, Samantha Lozano, Gabrielle McLemore and Mara Reardon [1] [7092596] [20-2238] (AG) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
