Wesley Ira Purkey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute, et al
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant: WESLEY I. PURKEY
Case Number: 20-2280
Filed: July 16, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2020 Filing 6 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [6] [7097376] [20-2280] (DRS) [Entered: 07/30/2020 11:44 AM]
July 30, 2020 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/16/2020 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7097378-2] [7097378] [20-2280] (DRS) [Entered: 07/30/2020 11:48 AM]
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Petitioner-Appellant filed this appeal of a district court order denying a stay of execution of his sentence and filed motions seeking a stay of execution pending appeal. Appellants sentence has been carried out rendering the motions and the appeal moot. Accordingly, all pending motions are DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as moot. [ # 4 ] [ # 2 ] [5] [7093982] [20-2280] (CMD) [Entered: 07/16/2020 09:21 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 4 Motion filed by Appellant Wesley I. Purkey for stay of the July 16, 2020 execution while pending appeal. [4] [7093935] [20-2280] (JR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 06:58 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Wesley I. Purkey's Supplemental argument in support of a stay of execution. [ # 2 ] [3] [7093933] [20-2280] (JR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 06:22 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 2 Emergency motion filed by Appellant Wesley I. Purkey for stay of execution. [2] [7093928] [20-2280] (JR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 03:35 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 1 Death penalty case. Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/30/2020. [1] [7093925] [20-2280]--[Updated 07/16/2020 by JR to reflect docketing statement was filed.] (JR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 03:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wesley Ira Purkey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Represented By: Shelese M. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Represented By: Shelese M. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: Shelese M. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: WESLEY I. PURKEY
Represented By: Rebecca E. Woodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?