Bruce Melton v. Pavilion Behavioral Health Sys
| PAVILION BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM |
| BRUCE MELTON |
| 20-2399 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bruce Melton v. Pavilion Behavioral Health Sys |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Appellant Bruce Melton is directed to showcause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). LJ. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Bruce Melton by 10/08/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7018 0360 0000 5171 3666. [8] [7110142] [20-2399] (LJ) [Entered: 09/24/2020 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Pavilion Behavioral Health System. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7106475] [20-2399] (Layton, Chad) [Entered: 09/09/2020 01:47 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. [ # 4 ] A review of the courts docket indicates that the appellants in forma pauperis status carried over for purposes of appeal. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED as unnecessary. CMD [5] [7105156] [20-2399] (AD) [Entered: 09/02/2020 11:46 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement Supplement to notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bruce Melton. [6] [7105318] [20-2399]--[Edited 09/04/2020 by FP to reflect that the supplement was construed as a docketing statement. ] (FP) [Entered: 09/02/2020 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Bruce Melton to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7105086] [20-2399] (PS) [Entered: 09/02/2020 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Chad J. Layton for Appellee Pavilion Behavioral Health System. [3] [7100996] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2399] (Layton, Chad) [Entered: 08/14/2020 10:38 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Bruce Melton is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Bruce Melton by 08/28/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 3560. [2] [7100942] [20-2399] (AD) [Entered: 08/14/2020 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Bruce Melton by 08/05/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 08/12/2020. Appellant's brief due on or before 09/08/2020 for Bruce Melton [1] [7097303] [20-2399] (AP) [Entered: 07/30/2020 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bruce Melton v. Pavilion Behavioral Health Sys | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PAVILION BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM | |
| Represented By: | Chad Jonathan Layton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: BRUCE MELTON | |
| Represented By: | Bruce Melton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
