Robert Wright v. Shaun Funk, et al
| ROBERT J. WRIGHT |
| JOSHUA KOLBO, SHAUN FUNK and RYAN NEIS |
| 20-2546 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Robert J. Wright. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7113859] [20-2546] (MAN) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Anthony D. Russomanno for Appellees Shaun Funk, Joshua Kolbo and Ryan Neis. [3] [7108187] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-2546] [3] [7108187] [20-2546]--[Edited 09/16/2020 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Russomanno, Anthony) [Entered: 09/16/2020 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Robert J. Wright leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 09/01/2020. District Court has assessed a $1.07 initial partial filing fee. [2] [7104834] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 10/01/2020. [20-2546] (CAH) [Entered: 09/01/2020 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Robert J. Wright by 08/21/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 08/31/2020. [1] [7101409] [20-2546] (CG) [Entered: 08/17/2020 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
