Richard Cole v. David Gomez
| RICHARD COLE |
| DAVID GOMEZ, Warden |
| 20-2553 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion to temporarily suspend the filing of appellant's certificate of appealability or grant an extension of time in the alternative, filed on 10/9/20. The appellants motion is GRANTED to the extent that any separate request for a certificate of appealability is due by December 9, 2020. In the event that the appellant does not file a motion by that date, his notice of appeal previously docketed in this court will be deemed to constitute an application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). [ # 6 ] CMD [7] [7113952] [20-2553] (FP) [Entered: 10/13/2020 09:21 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Richard Cole for temporarily suspend the filing of appellant's of COA. [6] [7113842] [20-2553] (CM) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Richard Cole leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 09/18/2020. [5] [7109047] [20-2553] (CG) [Entered: 09/18/2020 03:43 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This appeal shall proceed to a determination of appellants fee status on appeal, and to a determination whether a certificate of appealability should issue. Briefing remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [7105082] [20-2553] (ZNS) [Entered: 09/02/2020 09:44 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Richard Cole to file and attach sworn declaration to Notice of Appeal. Sworn Declaration of Richard Cole tendered with motion. [3] [7104066] [20-2553]--[Edited 08/28/2020 by MM to reflect sworn declaration tendered with motion to file.] (CM) [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:34 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall file a notarized statement or a sworn declaration under penalty of perjury (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 which sets forth the date the notice of appeal was given to prison staff for purposes of e-filing. See Taylor v. Brown, 787 F. 3d 851, 858-859 (7th Cir. 2014). Appellants notarized statement or sworn declaration shall be filed on or before 09/02/2020. (See order for further details). DW [2] [2] [7102153] [20-2553] (MM) [Entered: 08/19/2020 03:15 PM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 07/13/2020. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/31/2020. [1] [7101590] [20-2553] (MM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Cole v. David Gomez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RICHARD COLE | |
| Represented By: | Richard Cole |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DAVID GOMEZ, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Michael M. Glick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
