Durwyn Talley v. Kelly Renzi, et al
| DURWYN TALLEY |
| ANDREA YUHAS, MELVIN HINTON, KELLY RENZI, JOSEPH JENNINGS and CRYSTAL CARSON |
| 20-2554 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER re: 1) Plaintiffs Motion for Substitution of Judges and Change of Venue. 2) Plaintiffs Objection to the District Courts Void Order Given on 8-25-2020 Because it Exceed Its Power and Jurisdiction Given to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit and Violates 28 U.S.C.A. 1915(g). The documents will be filed without court action. The court will not accept any other filing from appellant until the district court has determined whether he is in imminent danger. JPK [10] [7107559] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:42 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed Objection by Appellant Durwyn Talley to to the District Court's order given on 08/25/2020. [9][7105892] [20-2554] (CAH) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Durwyn Talley for substitution of Judges and change of venue. [8] [7105889] [20-2554] (CAH) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:49 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Plaintiff's objection to the suspension of his appeal pending payment of fees and/or plaintiff objects to this court's allowing the district court address the imminent danger question. The motion will be filed without court action. JPK [7] [7104311] [20-2554] (ZNS) [Entered: 08/28/2020 03:33 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Durwyn Talley to object the suspension of appeal pending payment of fees. [6] [7104053] [20-2554] (CM) [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:21 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to this courts August 17, 2020, order in No. 20-2416, proceedings in this appeal are SUSPENDED pending the district courts determination on appellant Durwyn Talleys allegations of imminent danger. EBG [5] [7101695] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:15 PM]
|
| Filing 4 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [4] [7101690] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Major French, Dr. Howell, Dr. Gasteau, Dr. Sokos, Kelly Petrovics, Sgt. Miller, Lt. Lewis, Terri Kennedy, Emily Ruskins, C/O Bailey, C/O Frazier, C/O Holocher, C/O Staiber, Lt. Eutsy, et al. [3] [7101689] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/01/2020. [2][7101634] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 09/01/2020. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Durwyn Talley by 07/14/2020. [1] [7101630] [20-2554] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
