Paul Ammerman v. Michael Dittmann
PAUL D. AMMERMAN |
MICHAEL A. DITTMANN |
20-2596 |
August 24, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Filed Response by Appellee Michael A. Dittmann Attorney Scott E. Rosenow to Court Order of 10/13/2020, Doc. 13. [17][7116298] [20-2596] (Rosenow, Scott) [Entered: 10/21/2020 12:34 PM] |
Filing 16 Appearance form filed by Attorney Scott E. Rosenow for Appellee Michael A. Dittmann. [16] [7115687] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-2596] [16] [7115687] [20-2596]--[Edited 10/19/2020 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Rosenow, Scott) [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:43 PM] |
Filing 15 Filed Response by Appellant Paul D. Ammerman to Court's Order. [15][7115475] [20-2596] (CAH) [Entered: 10/16/2020 03:51 PM] |
Filing 14 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Paul D. Ammerman. [14] [7115468] [20-2596] (CM) [Entered: 10/16/2020 03:48 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER: Appellee shall file a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 1, 2020. (See order for further details). Response due for Appellee Michael A. Dittmann by 10/21/2020. DW [13] [7114379] [20-2596] (ZNS) [Entered: 10/14/2020 08:54 AM] |
Filing 12 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Paul D. Ammerman. [12] [7113837] [20-2596] (CM) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:31 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER re: Motion for access to release account, filed on 10/8/20. The motion is DENIED. The proper usage of release-account funds is for the prison itself to decide. [ # 9 ] TDK [11] [7113657] [20-2596] (FP) [Entered: 10/09/2020 10:10 AM] |
Filing 10 ORDER re: Motion to extend time. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the appellant shall file his memorandum in response to the courts order dated September 1, 2020, by no later than November 4, 2020.CMD [10] [7113558] [20-2596] (AG) [Entered: 10/08/2020 04:10 PM] |
Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Paul D. Ammerman to release account. [9] [7113420] [20-2596] (CM) [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:27 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 10/06/2020. [8] [7113028] [20-2596] (CG) [Entered: 10/06/2020 04:55 PM] |
Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Paul D. Ammerman to extend time. [7] [7112966] [20-2596] (MAN) [Entered: 10/06/2020 03:17 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER: Paul D. Ammerman shall show cause for failure to respond to the court's order of 9/1/20. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Paul D. Ammerman by 10/14/2020. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 0202. [6] [7111680] [20-2596] (ER) [Entered: 09/30/2020 04:17 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER re: Letter, filed by pro se appellant on 09/24/2020. With respect to the appellants fee status, a review of the docket indicates that the appellants motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending in the district court. Specifically, the appellant must submit a six-month inmate account statement to the district court by 10/14/2020. Further, the appellant is reminded of his obligation to file a memorandum in response to the courts order dated 09/01/2020. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. CMD [5] [7110692] [20-2596] (MM) [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:19 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed letter from Appellant Paul D. Ammerman. [4] [7110302] [20-2596] (MAN) [Entered: 09/24/2020 03:39 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed district court order dated 09/23/2020, I will give petitioner an extension of time, until October 14, 2020, to submit a six-month inmate account statement. Petitioner is reminded that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his appeal. Forwarded to SCR. [3] [7109779] [20-2596] (CM) [Entered: 09/23/2020 10:19 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. (See order for further details) [2] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Paul D. Ammerman by 09/15/2020. DW [2] [7104899] [20-2596] (ZNS) [Entered: 09/01/2020 02:10 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 08/14/2020. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 09/08/2020. [1] [7103351] [20-2596] (FP) [Entered: 08/25/2020 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paul Ammerman v. Michael Dittmann | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: PAUL D. AMMERMAN | |
Represented By: | Paul D. Ammerman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: MICHAEL A. DITTMANN | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Department of Justice - Habeas |
Represented By: | Scott Rosenow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.