Jennifer L. Chambers v. Andrew Saul
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| JENNIFER L. CHAMBERS |
| 20-2597 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jennifer L. Chambers v. Andrew Saul |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief [ # 6 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 11/05/2020 for Jennifer L. Chambers. Appellee's brief due on or before 12/07/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/28/2020 for Appellant Jennifer L. Chambers. CMD [7] [7110906] [20-2597] (AG) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:54 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Jennifer L. Chambers to extend time to file appellant brief. [6] [7110853] [20-2597] (Duncan, Dana) [Entered: 09/28/2020 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney David Levitt for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. [5] [7106765] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-2597]--[Edited 09/10/2020 by MM to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Levitt, David) [Entered: 09/10/2020 01:31 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: On August 27, 2020, the District Court allowed the plaintiffs appeal to continue to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly,IT IS ORDERED that briefing in this appeal will now proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/05/2020 for Jennifer L. Chambers. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/04/2020 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/25/2020 for Appellant Jennifer L. Chambers. JR [7104930] [20-2597] (AP) [Entered: 09/01/2020 02:39 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. # 17 , is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. Because plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case, no further authorization is required under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).. [3] [7104042] [20-2597] (AP) [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jennifer L. Chambers. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7103957] [20-2597] (Duncan, Dana) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jennifer Chambers by 08/31/2020. [1] [7103074] [20-2597] (ZNS) [Entered: 08/24/2020 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jennifer L. Chambers v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Megan Hugo |
| Represented By: | Albert Bianchi Jr. |
| Represented By: | David Levitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JENNIFER L. CHAMBERS | |
| Represented By: | Dana Wayne Duncan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
