Wade Hallett v. Philip Brehm, et al
Defendant / Appellee: MARK D. KOPP, UNKNOWN LIABILITY INSURER OF PHILIP BREHM and PHILIP R. BREHM
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE A. HALLETT
Case Number: 20-2609
Filed: August 25, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 21, 2021 Wade Hallett v. Philip Brehm

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: 1. Motion for reconsideration. 2. Petition for rehearing. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Appellant shall file the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 70160340000113341989.; PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/06/2020 [14] [7117038] MWR [20-2609] (AG) [Entered: 10/23/2020 02:46 PM]
October 22, 2020 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett for reconsideration of the denial of in forma pauperis. [13] [7116715] [20-2609] (CM) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:51 PM]
October 22, 2020 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett for reconsideration. [12] [7116701] [20-2609] (MAN) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:41 PM]
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Motions for in forma pauperis. Upon consideration of the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal, the appellants motion filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, the district courts order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) certifying that the appeal was filed in bad faith, and the record on appeal, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Hallett has not identified a good-faith argument that the district court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over his claims. We understand the district court to have dismissed Halletts lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and not on the merits, so the dismissal is without prejudice to refiling in state court. Hallett shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 4956. [11] [7113227] MWR [20-2609] (AG) [Entered: 10/07/2020 02:16 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7112583] [20-2609] (CM) [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:17 PM]
September 21, 2020 Filing 9 Prose motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. PLRA Memorandum tendered. Trust Statement tendered. [9] [7109330] [20-2609] (MAN) [Entered: 09/21/2020 03:54 PM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Wade A. Hallett Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [8] [7107553] [20-2609] (DRS) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:35 PM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7107543] [20-2609] (DRS) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:28 PM]
September 3, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Wade A. Hallett. [6] [7105584] [20-2609] (CAH) [Entered: 09/03/2020 03:21 PM]
August 27, 2020 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Wade A. Hallett leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/27/2020. Plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment is DENIED.[5] [7103947] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/28/2020 [20-2609] (CM) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:06 PM]
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re: Motion to Stay. [ # 2 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, any relief requested in the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated August 25, 2020. [4] [7103604] CMD [20-2609] (AD) [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:46 AM]
August 25, 2020 Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7103494] [20-2609] (CG) [Entered: 08/25/2020 04:04 PM]
August 25, 2020 Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wade A. Hallett to stay the appeal. [2] [7103452] [20-2609] (CG) [Entered: 08/25/2020 02:29 PM]
August 25, 2020 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 09/08/2020. [1] [7103441] [20-2609] (CG) [Entered: 08/25/2020 02:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wade Hallett v. Philip Brehm, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK D. KOPP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN LIABILITY INSURER OF PHILIP BREHM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIP R. BREHM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: WADE A. HALLETT
Represented By: Wade A. Hallett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?