Raj Patel v. Manisha Patel, et al
| MANISHA PATEL, KARTIK PATEL, CHARMI PATEL, DHAVAL PATEL and NEAL PATEL |
| RAJ PATEL |
| 20-2713 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Duplicate copy of 9/14 filing filed by Appellant Raj Patel. [12] [7109693] [20-2713]--[Edited 09/23/2020 by MAN] (MAN) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:26 PM] |
Filing 11
Order issued DENYING motion for electronic filing. [ # 6 ] JPK [11] [7108136] [20-2713] (ER) [Entered: 09/16/2020 10:23 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [10] [7107974] [20-2713] (CM) [Entered: 09/15/2020 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Raj Patel, per order. Disk not required. [9] [7107551] [20-2713] (CM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:32 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion In Support of notice of appeal seeking to overturn the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Swanson, on its face and as-applied by the Southern District of Indiana, for it is inconsistent with Iqbal, the District Court's replication fo Twombly, the District Court's categorization of honest services fraud as only a criminal statute, the District Court's analysis under diversity jurisdiction, and motion to waive oral argument (motion in support of dkt. 1-1 at 1). Review of the appellants motion in support of his notice of appeal indicates that he would like this document to serve as his opening brief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall docket the motion as the appellants opening brief. If the appellant does not want the motion to serve as his opening brief, he should inform the court by September 28, 2020. The appellant is reminded that he must pay the docket fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by September 23, 2020. [ # 7 ] SCR [8] [7107519] [20-2713] (ER) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:59 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Raj Patel's Motion In Support of notice of appeal seeking to overturn the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Swanson, on its face and as-applied by the Southern District of Indiana, for it is inconsistent with Iqbal, the District Court's replication fo Twombly, the District Court's categorization of honest services fraud as only a criminal statute, the District Court's analysis under diversity jurisdiction, and motion to waive oral argument (motion in support of dkt. 1-1 at 1). [7] [7107319] [20-2713]--[Edited 09/14/2020 by ER -construed as APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF per the court's 9/14/20 order ] (JR) [Entered: 09/14/2020 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Raj Patel for electronic filing. [6] [7107313] [20-2713] (JR) [Entered: 09/14/2020 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Raj Patel. [5] [7106932] [20-2713] (JR) [Entered: 09/11/2020 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Raj Patel. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7106930] [20-2713] (JR) [Entered: 09/11/2020 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES Nina Patel, Ajay Nair, Emory University, Inc., and Donald J. Trump. [3] [7106690] [20-2713] (ZNS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7106686] [20-2713] (ZNS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Raj Patel by 09/14/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 09/23/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/23/2020 for Appellant Raj Patel. [1] [7106677] [20-2713] (ZNS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 09:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
