Christopher Macy v. John Galipeau
Respondent / Appellee: DENNIS REAGLE, Warden and JOHN GALIPEAU
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. MACY
Case Number: 20-2742
Filed: September 11, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re: Motion to substitute party. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The clerk has updated the courts docket to reflect that John Galipeau is now the appellee in this matter. CMD [15] [7118934] [20-2742] (AG) [Entered: 11/02/2020 02:14 PM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 14 Appellee Dennis Reagle substituted by Appellee John Galipeau, pursuant to FRAP 43(c). [14] [7118825] [20-2742] (MM) [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:23 AM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 13 Filed Response by Appellee Dennis Reagle to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [13][7118785] [20-2742] (Talbot, Monika) [Entered: 11/02/2020 09:17 AM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 12 Motion filed by Appellee Dennis Reagle to Substitute Party. [12] [7118783] [20-2742] (Talbot, Monika) [Entered: 11/02/2020 09:14 AM]
October 28, 2020 Filing 11 Prose motion filed by Appellant Christopher M. Macy to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [11] [7117985] [20-2742] (CM) [Entered: 10/28/2020 01:39 PM]
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Papers filed by appellant. IT IS ORDERED that the appellee shall file, on or before November 2, 2020, a response to appellants filings, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 15, 2020 DW [10] [7116869] [20-2742] (AP) [Entered: 10/23/2020 10:14 AM]
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Motion for enlargement of time to file for in forma pauperis, filed o 10/7/2020. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of this court by October 30, 2020. [ # 7 ] CMD [9] [7113517] [20-2742] (FP) [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:41 PM]
October 7, 2020 Filing 8 Filed notice of change of address for Christopher M. Macy (#956245) from Pendleton Correctional Facility, Pendleton, IN 46064 to Westville Correctional Facility, Westville IN 46391. [8] [7113391] [20-2742] (MM) [Entered: 10/08/2020 09:37 AM]
October 7, 2020 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher M. Macy for enlargement of time to file in forma pauperis. [7] [7113263] [20-2742] (MAN) [Entered: 10/07/2020 03:04 PM]
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum. IT IS ORDERED that appellant Christopher M. Macy file, on or before October 9, 2020, a statement advising the court whether he intends to file a motion to extend the time to appeal with the district court. Appellant Christopher M. Macy must remember that any motion to extend the time to appeal has to be filed with the district court, not this court. DW [6] [7111368] [20-2742] (AP) [Entered: 09/29/2020 04:14 PM]
September 28, 2020 Filing 5 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Christopher M. Macy. [5] [7111071] [20-2742] (MAN) [Entered: 09/28/2020 04:11 PM]
September 16, 2020 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Christopher M. Macy leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/16/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/16/2020 for Appellant Christopher M. Macy [7108293] [4] [7108293] [20-2742] (AP) [Entered: 09/16/2020 02:35 PM]
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The appellant, on or before September 28, 2020, file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7107667] DW [3] [7107667] [20-2742] (CG) [Entered: 09/15/2020 09:15 AM]
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order issued in light of Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000), this case may proceed without a certificate of appealability. MB & CD [2] [7107466] [20-2742] (FP) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:10 PM]
September 11, 2020 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 09/25/2020. [1] [7107410] [20-2742] (FP) [Entered: 09/14/2020 12:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Macy v. John Galipeau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
Represented By: Monika Prekopa Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JOHN GALIPEAU
Represented By: Monika Prekopa Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. MACY
Represented By: Christopher M. Macy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?