Everardo Hoyos v. Equifax Information Services, et al
TRANSUNION LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
EVERARDO HOYOS |
20-2776 |
September 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Everardo Hoyos v. Equifax Information Services |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: The court, on its own initiative, ORDERS all appellants and all appellees to file a Statement advising the court whether these appeals should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and disposition. The parties should fully explain the reasoning for their answer to this question in their statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties advise the court whether they are aware of any other cases with substantially the same issue(s) as in these five appeals either in this court or in the district court. The parties statements on these matters are due no later than 11/20/2020. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the briefing in these five appeals is SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [14] [7121667] [20-2373, 20-2392, 20-2775, 20-2776, 20-3000] (MM) [Entered: 11/13/2020 03:41 PM] |
Filing 13 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Everardo Hoyos. [13] [7120860] [20-2776] (SK) [Entered: 11/10/2020 02:11 PM] |
Filing 12 Brief deficiency letter sent to Appellant Everardo Hoyos. The Appellant brief was electronically filed on 10/26/2020. The paper copies of this brief were due to be submitted to the Clerk's Office by 11/02/2020. The paper copies have not been received by this court. Paper copies due on 11/16/2020 or the court may issue a Rule of Show Cause order pursuant to Circuit Rule 31. [12] [7120532] [20-2776] (LJ) [Entered: 11/09/2020 03:13 PM] |
Filing 11 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Everardo Hoyos. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/25/2020 for Equifax Information Services, LLC and TransUnion LLC. Paper copies due on 11/02/2020 Electronically Transmitted. [11] [7117494] [20-2776] (CM) [Entered: 10/27/2020 08:52 AM] |
Filing 10 Submitted appellant brief by Celetha Chatman for Appellant Everardo Hoyos. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7117475] [20-2776] (JAD) [Entered: 10/27/2020 08:04 AM] |
Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Daniel Brown for Appellant Everardo Hoyos. [9] [7117461] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2776]--[Edited 10/27/2020 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Brown, Daniel) [Entered: 10/26/2020 05:08 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Laura K. Rang for Appellee TransUnion LLC has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7116615] [20-2776] (LJ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 12:46 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Celetha C. Chatman for Appellant Everardo Hoyos has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [7] [7116585] [20-2776] (LJ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:52 AM] |
Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Claire Brennan for Appellee Equifax Information Services, LLC. [6] [7116439] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2776]--[Edited 10/22/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Brennan, Claire) [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:22 PM] |
Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Camille R. Nicodemus for Appellee TransUnion LLC. [5] [7115974] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2776] --[Edited 10/21/2020 by AP- to reflect addition of counsel] (Nicodemus, Camille) [Entered: 10/20/2020 01:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Everardo Hoyos. [4] [7111722] [20-2776] (Brown, Daniel) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:08 PM] |
Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Everardo Hoyos. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7110888] [20-2776] (AD) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:34 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [7109036] [2] [7109036] [20-2776] (MM) [Entered: 09/18/2020 03:20 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Everardo Hoyos by 09/22/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 09/30/2020. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/26/2020 for Everardo Hoyos. [1] [7108215] [20-2776]--[Edited 09/17/2020 by JR.] (AG) [Entered: 09/16/2020 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.