Kim Millbrook v. James Pulliam, et al
| JAMES PULLIAM, STEWART INMAN, SHERRI MARTIN, WILLIAM COX and BRIAN MCGRATH |
| KIM LEE MILLBROOK |
| 20-2992 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Matthew Allen Warner for Appellee James Pulliam has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7125204] [20-2992] (LJ) [Entered: 12/02/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: 1) Motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis. 2) Memorandum in support. Upon consideration of the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal, the appellants motion filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, the district courts order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) certifying that the appeal was filed in bad faith, and the record on appeal, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. The appellant has not identified a good faith issue that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants. The appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 1490. [7] [7121169] MWR [20-2992] (AG) [Entered: 11/12/2020 10:38 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kim Lee Millbrook Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [6] [7119386] [20-2992] (MAN) [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kim Lee Millbrook to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7119385] [20-2992] (MAN) [Entered: 11/03/2020 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Craig L. Unrath for Appellees William Cox, Stewart Inman, Sherri Martin and Brian McGrath. for Kyle Fever, Nicholas Melvin, David Peters and Hope Miner. [4] [7116427] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-2992]--[Edited 10/22/2020 by MM to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 10/21/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Kim Lee Millbrook leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/16/2020. [3] [7115366] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/16/2020 [20-2992] (CM) [Entered: 10/16/2020 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Kyle Fever, David Peters, Nicholas Melvin and Hope Miner. [2] [7115232] [20-2992] (AD) [Entered: 10/16/2020 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/29/2020. [1] [7115211] [20-2992] (AD) [Entered: 10/16/2020 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
