Sandra Nigl v. Cathy Jess, et al
| DAWN CRIM, DANIEL SCHROEDER, DEDE MORGAN, MATTHEW WALLOCH, MICHAEL MEISNER, CODY WAGNER, SANDRA HAUTAMAUKI and CATHY JESS |
| SANDRA K. NIGL, formerly know as SANDRA K. JOHNSTON, PH. D |
| 20-3112 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Sandra K. Nigl. Electronically Transmitted. [12] [7126621] [20-3112] (CM) [Entered: 12/08/2020 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted appellant brief by Pro Se Plaintiff-Appellant, Sandra K. Nigl for Appellant Sandra K. Nigl. [11] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7126561] [20-3112] (Nigl, Sandra) [Entered: 12/08/2020 07:33 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER re: Motion to file electroinically as a pro se plaintiff-appellant, filed on 11/24/20. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant Sandra K. Nigl is granted leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the pro se litigants filing user status upon the termination of the case, termination of the litigants pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. [ # 8 ] MWR [10] [7124034] [20-3112] (FP) [Entered: 11/25/2020 09:14 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Appearance form filed by Attorney Steven C. Kilpatrick for Appellees Dawn Crim, Sandra Hautamauki, Cathy Jess, Michael Meisner, Dede Morgan, Daniel Schroeder, Cody Wagner and Matthew Walloch. [9] [7123809] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-3112] [9] [7123809] [20-3112]--[Edited 11/24/2020 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Kilpatrick, Steven) [Entered: 11/24/2020 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Sandra K. Nigl to become an electronic filer. [8] [7123776] [20-3112] (JAD) [Entered: 11/24/2020 11:26 AM] |
|
Filing 7
Order issued DENYING motion for appointment of counsel. [ # 5 ] See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). It is not necessary to recruit counsel to assist in resolving the issues raised on appeal. Briefing shall proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/23/2020 for Sandra K. Nigl. Appellees' brief due on or before 01/22/2021 for Sandra Hautamauki, Cathy Jess, Michael Meisner, Dede Morgan, Daniel Schroeder, Cody Wagner and Matthew Walloch. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/12/2021 for Appellant Sandra K. Nigl. MWR [7] [7123386] [20-3112] (ZNS) [Entered: 11/23/2020 08:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for recruitment of counsel filed by the appellant on November 6, 2020. CMD. [6] [7120301] [20-3112] (AG) [Entered: 11/09/2020 08:50 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Sandra K. Nigl for recruitment of counsel. [5] [7120223] [20-3112] (CAH) [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:20 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The District Court denied plaintiff's request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis as unnecessary because plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. This appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/15/2020 for Sandra K. Nigl. Appellees' brief due on or before 01/14/2021 for Sandra Hautamauki, Cathy Jess, Michael Meisner, Dede Morgan, Daniel Schroeder, Cody Wagner and Matthew Walloch. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/04/2021 for Appellant Sandra K. Nigl. JR [7119189] [20-3112] (CG) [Entered: 11/03/2020 10:38 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order of 11/2/2020. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. #[157], is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. Because plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case, no further authorization is required under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). [3] [7119011] [20-3112] (CG) [Entered: 11/02/2020 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Dawn Crim, per District Court docket. [2] [7118165] [20-3112] (CG) [Entered: 10/29/2020 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/12/2020. [1] [7118161] [20-3112] (CG) [Entered: 10/29/2020 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
