Bradford Bohanon v. City of Indianapolis, et al
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL REIGER, 5135 HOLDINGS INC., doing business as Mikie's Pub, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and JOHN SERBAN, also known as Nick Serban, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRADFORD BOHANON
Case Number: 20-3125
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 22, 2022 Summary Bohanon v. City of Indianapolis

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2020 Filing 14 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [14] [7129498] [20-3125] (LJ) [Entered: 12/18/2020 09:35 AM]
December 15, 2020 Filing 12 Re-Submitted appellant brief by Robert Oakley for Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [12] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7128774] [20-3125] (Oakley, Robert) [Entered: 12/15/2020 10:09 PM]
December 8, 2020 Filing 13 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Bradford Bohanon. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/07/2021 for 5135 Holdings Inc., City of Indianapolis, Michael Reiger and John Serban. Paper copies due on 12/18/2020 Electronically Transmitted. [13] [7128873] [20-3125] (CM) [Entered: 12/16/2020 10:39 AM]
December 8, 2020 Filing 11 Brief deficiency letter sent to Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [11] [7127123] [20-3125] (CM) [Entered: 12/09/2020 10:03 AM]
December 8, 2020 Filing 10 Submitted appellant brief by Robert Oakley for Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7127055] [20-3125] (Oakley, Robert) [Entered: 12/08/2020 11:16 PM]
December 7, 2020 Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Daniel K. Dilley for Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [9] [7126397] (L-No; E-No; R-No) [20-3125] [9] [7126397] [20-3125]--[Edited 12/07/2020 by ZNS to reflect the addition of counsel] (Dilley, Daniel) [Entered: 12/07/2020 02:08 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mr. Robert M. Oakley for Appellant Bradford Bohanon has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7125176] [20-3125] (LJ) [Entered: 12/02/2020 09:41 AM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Edwward C. Harcourt for Appellee 5135 Holdings Inc. has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [7] [7125160] [20-3125] (LJ) [Entered: 12/02/2020 09:14 AM]
December 1, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mr. Andrew R. Duncan for Appellee John Serban has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [6] [7124937] [20-3125] (LJ) [Entered: 12/01/2020 02:22 PM]
November 19, 2020 Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney Andrew J. Upchurch for Appellee City of Indianapolis. [5] [7122998] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-3125]--[Edited 11/20/2020 by AD to reflect proper document filed.] (Upchurch, Andrew) [Entered: 11/19/2020 05:16 PM]
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [4] [7121621] [20-3125] (Jones, Cathy) [Entered: 11/13/2020 02:07 PM]
November 12, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Bradford Bohanon. [3] [7121265] [20-3125] (PS) [Entered: 11/12/2020 02:03 PM]
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7118906] DW [2] [7118906] [20-3125] (AG) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:35 PM]
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/12/2020. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/08/2020 for Bradford Bohanon. [1] [7118532] [20-3125] (FP) [Entered: 10/30/2020 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bradford Bohanon v. City of Indianapolis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL REIGER
Represented By: Michael Reiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: 5135 HOLDINGS INC., doing business as Mikie's Pub
Represented By: Edwward C. Harcourt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Represented By: Andrew Upchurch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN SERBAN, also known as Nick Serban, in his official and individual capacities
Represented By: Andrew R. Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRADFORD BOHANON
Represented By: Robert M. Oakley
Represented By: Daniel K. Dilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?