Lamone Lauderdale v. Dushan Zatecky
Petitioner / Appellant: LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Respondent / Appellee: DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
Case Number: 20-3545
Filed: December 30, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Response by Appellee Dushan Zatecky to Regarding Lauderdale's Motion to Clarify. [8][7144009] [20-3545] (Recker, Abigail) [Entered: 02/25/2021 01:19 PM]
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The appellee shall file, on or before February 25, 2021, a brief memorandum addressing whether petitioner- appellant Lamone Lauderdales Motion to Clarify, filed with the district court on November 16, 2020, can be treated as a motion to extend the time to appeal. (See order for details.) DW [7] [7141132] [20-3545] (CG) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:15 AM]
February 4, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Response by Appellee Dushan Zatecky to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [6][7139577] [20-3545] (Recker, Abigail) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:08 PM]
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on January 27, 2021. The appellee shall file, on or before February 4, 2021, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of January 5, 2021. DW [5] [7137518] [20-3545] (FP) [Entered: 01/27/2021 02:50 PM]
January 27, 2021 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Lamone Lauderdale. [4] [7137364] [20-3545] (CAH) [Entered: 01/27/2021 10:56 AM]
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and because it is unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. (See order for further details). [7132319] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Lamone Lauderdale by 01/19/2021. DW. [3] [7132319] [20-3545] (ZNS) [Entered: 01/05/2021 01:35 PM]
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: in light of Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000), this case may proceed without a certificate of appealability. JR [2] [7131635] [20-3545] (AG) [Entered: 01/04/2021 10:27 AM]
December 30, 2020 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/08/2021 for Lamone Lauderdale. Transcript information sheet due by 01/13/2021. [1] [7131630] [20-3545] (AG) [Entered: 01/04/2021 10:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lamone Lauderdale v. Dushan Zatecky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Represented By: Lamone Lauderdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
Represented By: Abigail Rae Recker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?