USA v. Ezequiel Guadarrama-Rodriguez
| EZEQUIEL GUADARRAMA-RODRIGUEZ |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-1196 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Transcript information sheet due by 02/16/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ezequiel Guadarrama-Rodriguez by 02/08/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/15/2021 for Ezequiel Guadarrama-Rodriguez. [1] [7138840] [21-1196] (AD) [Entered: 02/02/2021 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Ezequiel Guadarrama-Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: EZEQUIEL GUADARRAMA-RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Todd M. Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Kapsak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
