Barbara Hendrickson v. Andrew Saul
| BARBARA HENDRICKSON |
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| 21-1230 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mr. Charles Edward Binder for Appellee Barbara Hendrickson has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [7] [7146714] [21-1230] (LJ) [Entered: 03/11/2021 12:16 PM] |
Filing 6
Order issued GRANTING joint motion to hold appeal in abeyance. In light of the United States Supreme Courts grant of certiorari in Carr v. Saul, No. 19-1442, 2020 WL 6551771 (Nov. 9, 2020) and Davis v. Saul, No. 20-105, 2020 WL 6551772 (Nov. 9, 2020), briefing in this appeal shall be SUSPENDED until the Supreme Court renders its decision. The parties shall file statements of position within 14 days of a decision in Carr v. Saul and Davis v. Saul. [ # 5 ] MWR [6] [7141835] [21-1230] (ER) [Entered: 02/17/2021 11:58 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Joint motion filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul to stay case. [5] [7141574] [21-1230] (Godfrey, Jean) [Entered: 02/16/2021 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Andrew M. Saul. [4] [7141571] [21-1230] (Godfrey, Jean) [Entered: 02/16/2021 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Daniel S Jones for Appellee Barbara Hendrickson. [3] [7140149] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-1230] [3] [7140149] [21-1230]--[Edited 02/08/2021 by ZNS to reflect the addition of counsel] (Jones, Daniel) [Entered: 02/08/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jean Godfrey for Appellant Andrew M. Saul. [2] [7139869] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-1230] -[Edited 02/05/2021 by AG to reflect addition of counsel] (Godfrey, Jean) [Entered: 02/05/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. U.S. Appeal. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 02/18/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/16/2021 for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security [1] [7139793] [21-1230] (AP) [Entered: 02/05/2021 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Barbara Hendrickson v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: BARBARA HENDRICKSON | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Jones |
| Represented By: | Charles Edward Binder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Jean Godfrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
