Paul Olsson v. Daniel Dyslin, et al
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD MALIS, JEFF PHARRIS, DANIEL DYSLIN, DANIEL HARDY and TOM ZUBIK
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL OLSSON
Case Number: 21-1294
Filed: February 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Paul Olsson Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [10] [7153095] [21-1294] (DRS) [Entered: 04/09/2021 03:10 PM]
March 25, 2021 Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Paul Olsson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 03/24/2021. [9] [7149698] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/26/2021 [21-1294] (CM) [Entered: 03/25/2021 09:33 AM]
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Verified motion for extension of time and legal resources, filed on March 17, 2021. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated February 17, 2021. [ # 7 ] [ # 7 ] [8] [7148582] CMD [21-1294] (FP) [Entered: 03/19/2021 11:38 AM]
March 17, 2021 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Paul Olsson to extend time to file appellant's brief and appointment of counsel. [7] [7148066] [21-1294] (CAH) [Entered: 03/17/2021 03:39 PM]
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [6] [7145291] JR [21-1294] (CG) [Entered: 03/04/2021 10:15 AM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Paul Olsson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7145283] [21-1294] (MAN) [Entered: 03/04/2021 10:00 AM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Paul Olsson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7145269] [21-1294] (CAH) [Entered: 03/04/2021 09:42 AM]
February 17, 2021 Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7142116] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-1294] (ZNS) [Entered: 02/18/2021 11:16 AM]
February 17, 2021 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Diana Hogan, Bill Epperson, James Dimas, Brianna Wagner, Tahseen Mohammed, Crissy Carbonara, Martha Welch, The Office of the Inspector General, and Unknown OIG employees. [2] [7142111] [21-1294] (ZNS) [Entered: 02/18/2021 11:15 AM]
February 17, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Paul Olsson by 02/16/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/19/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 03/03/2021. [1] [7142096] [21-1294] (ZNS) [Entered: 02/18/2021 11:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Paul Olsson v. Daniel Dyslin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD MALIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFF PHARRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DANIEL DYSLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DANIEL HARDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOM ZUBIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PAUL OLSSON
Represented By: Paul Olsson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?