Christopher Bryant, et al v. Ron Neal
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER BRYANT
Respondent / Appellee: RON NEAL
Case Number: 21-1321
Filed: February 22, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Bryant for certificate of appealability. [12] [7153302] [21-1321] (PS) [Entered: 04/12/2021 11:35 AM]
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiff-appellant should use the same format to provide the information concerning his mailing of the Request for Certificate of Appealability to the district court. Accordingly, appellant shall provide the court with the information in the format noted, regarding the mailing of the Request for Certificate of Appealability to the district court. This document must be filed with the court no later than April 9, 2021. (See order for further details) DW [11] [7149855] [21-1321] (AD) [Entered: 03/25/2021 02:25 PM]
March 23, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Christopher Bryant memorandum stating why appeal should not be dismissed and why court should give petitioner a 6 month extension of time to file any and all proper motions and docketing statement forms in this case. [10] [7149333] [21-1321] (CAH) [Entered: 03/23/2021 03:58 PM]
March 23, 2021 Filing 9 Prose motion filed by Appellant Christopher Bryant to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [9] [7149330] [21-1321] (CAH) [Entered: 03/23/2021 03:57 PM]
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: re: Motion requesting for extension of time in which to file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the Court of Appeals. [ # 7 ] the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of this court by May 5, 2021. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [8] [7148941] [21-1321] (CG) [Entered: 03/22/2021 12:46 PM]
March 22, 2021 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Bryant to extend time to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [7] [7148844] [21-1321] (CAH) [Entered: 03/22/2021 10:26 AM]
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The appellant must inform the court whether the prison has a system designed for legal mail, and whether he used that system to mail his notice of appeal. Appellant further must provide a notarized statement or a declaration under penalty of perjury (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 which (1) sets forth the date the notice of appeal was placed in the prison's internal mail system, and (2) states whether first class postage was prepaid. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c) (prison mailbox rule). Appellant's statement or declaration shall be filed on or before March 25, 2021. (See order for details.) DW [6] [7146905] [21-1321] (CG) [Entered: 03/12/2021 08:57 AM]
March 11, 2021 Filing 5 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Christopher Bryant. [5] [7146664] [21-1321] (CM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 10:43 AM]
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Christopher Bryant is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Christopher Bryant by 03/23/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 1672. [4] [7146059] [21-1321] (AD) [Entered: 03/09/2021 08:44 AM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Christopher Bryant request for a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (See order for further details). Date IFP denied: 03/04/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/05/2021 for Appellant Christopher Bryant. [7145339] [3] [7145339] [21-1321] (MM) [Entered: 03/04/2021 11:59 AM]
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Christopher Bryant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7143229] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Christopher Bryant by 03/09/2021. [2] [7143229] [21-1321] (FP) [Entered: 02/23/2021 12:32 PM]
February 22, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 09/25/2020. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher Bryant by 02/26/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 03/08/2021. [1] [7142913] [21-1321] (ER) [Entered: 02/22/2021 12:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Bryant, et al v. Ron Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER BRYANT
Represented By: Christopher Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: RON NEAL
Represented By: Jesse Drum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?