Lorenzo Coben v. T. Watson
| T. J. WATSON, Warden |
| LORENZO LEWIS COBEN |
| 21-1324 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: This case shall proceed to a ruling on whether to summarily affirm the district courts judgment on the basis of the record and the appellants February 24, 2021 Motion to Request ReviewMisapplication of Law. Briefing is otherwise suspended pending further order of the court. MPB [7152758] [21-1324] (AG) [Entered: 04/08/2021 02:44 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7152232] [21-1324] (DRS) [Entered: 04/06/2021 03:48 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Request for Extension to File Docketing Statement. In light of the courts order dated March 23, 2021, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. CMD [7] [7149183] [21-1324] (AD) [Entered: 03/23/2021 11:32 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file docketing statement to the extent that the appellant shall file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by April 7, 2021. The clerk shall send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. [ # 4 ] CMD [6] [7149089] [21-1324] (FP) [Entered: 03/23/2021 08:50 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben to extend time to file the docketing statement [5] [7148870] [21-1324] (DRS) [Entered: 03/22/2021 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben to extend time to file the docketing statement [4] [7148731] [21-1324] (DRS) [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben by 03/24/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 1726. [3] [7146431] [21-1324] (AD) [Entered: 03/10/2021 10:54 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben to request review of misapplication of law. [2] [7143624] [21-1324] (PS) [Entered: 02/24/2021 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lorenzo Lewis Coben by 02/25/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/05/2021 for Lorenzo Lewis Coben. Transcript information sheet due by 03/08/2021. [1] [7143225] [21-1324] (MM) [Entered: 02/23/2021 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lorenzo Coben v. T. Watson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Brian L. Reitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: LORENZO LEWIS COBEN | |
| Represented By: | Lorenzo Lewis Coben |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
