Jason Smith, I v. AFSCME Council 31, et al
| TIMOTHY C. EVANS, Chief Judge, AFSCME COUNCIL 31, KARLO FLOWERS, CITY OF CHICAGO and SYDNEY ROBERTS |
| JASON SMITH, I |
| 21-1431 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jason Smith, I v. AFSCME Council 31 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER re: AFSCME defendants-appellees' motion for clarification regarding briefing. A review of the courts docket indicates that on October 13, 2020, the appellant filed his opening brief in appeal 20-2556. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED to the extent that briefing in these consolidated appeals will proceed as follows: The appellant shall file his opening brief in appeal 21-1431 on or before May 10, 2021. The appellees shall file their respective briefs on or before June 9, 2021. The appellant shall file his consolidated reply brief by June 30, 2021. Counsel for the appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a coappellees brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). CMD [15] [7153667] [20-2556, 21-1431] (CG) [Entered: 04/13/2021 11:59 AM]
|
| Filing 14 Motion filed by Appellee AFSCME Council 31, Local 3477 in 20-2556, Appellee AFSCME Council 31 in 21-1431 Clarification that Appellant's Brief filed on October 13, 2020, in Appeal No. 20-2556 (Doc. #13), is inoperative and appellees are not required to respond to it.. [14] [7153443] [20-2556, 21-1431] (Seltzer, Robert) [Entered: 04/12/2021 03:48 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: This court has received confirmation that the appellant paid the $505.00 appellate filing fees for appeal 21-1431. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing in these consolidated appeals will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/10/2021 for Jason Smith I. Appellees' briefs due on or before 06/09/2021 for AFSCME Council 31, Local 3477, Avik Das, Timothy C. Evans, Sharon T. Koc, Jennifer Nunez, William Patterson, AFSCME Council 31, City of Chicago, Karlo Flowers and Sydney Roberts. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/30/2021 for Appellant Jason Smith I. Counsel for the appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a coappellees brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). CMD [7152766] [20-2556, 21-1431] (ZNS) [Entered: 04/08/2021 02:50 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [12] [7152559] [21-1431] (CM) [Entered: 04/07/2021 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 11 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/20/2021 for Appellant Jason Smith I [11] [7152116] [21-1431] (AG) [Entered: 04/06/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 10 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Robert A. Seltzer for Appellee AFSCME Council 31. Additional Parties: AFSCME Local 3477, AFSCME International, Lee Saunders, Roberta Lynch, Mike Newman, Steve Kasperski, Lloyd C. Marshall. [10] [7151660] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-1431]--[Edited 04/05/2021 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Seltzer, Robert) [Entered: 04/02/2021 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appearance form filed by Attorney Suzanne M. Loose for Appellees Karlo Flowers, Sydney Roberts and City of Chicago in 21-1431. Additional Parties: Brandon Crase, Defendant-Appellee. [9] [7151488] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1431, 20-2556] [9] [7151488] [21-1431, 20-2556]--[Edited 04/02/2021 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 04/02/2021 11:26 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: re: Motion for to file electronically. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED to the extent that appellant Jason Smiths leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material is extended to appeal no. 21-1431. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the pro se litigants filing user status upon the termination of the case, termination of the litigants pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. JPK [8] [7147701] [20-2556, 21-1431] (CG) [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: The AFSCME Defendants-Appellees Statement Regarding Consolidation With Appeal No. 21-1431 and State Defendants-Appellees Statement On Consolidation, both filed with this court on March 12, 2021, and Jason Smith -Appellants Statement Regarding Consolidation With Appeal No. 21-1431 filed on March 15, 2021. IT IS ORDERED that these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition, but briefing is SUSPENDED. The remainder of the briefing schedule will be set upon payment of the required filing and docketing fees for Appeal No. 21-1431. DW [7] [7147680] [20-2556, 21-1431] (AG) [Entered: 03/16/2021 11:15 AM]
|
| Terminated Attorney Mia Buntic and added Attorney Chaya M. Citrin for Appellee Timothy C. Evans in case 21-1431, pursuant to email notification from the Office of the Illinois Attorney General regarding counsel of record. [7147803-2] [7147803] [21-1431] (JR) [Entered: 03/16/2021 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Smith, I to become an electronic filer. [6] [7147322] [21-1431] (CAH) [Entered: 03/15/2021 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Smith, I. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7147236] [21-1431] (CAH) [Entered: 03/15/2021 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney MYRIAM ZRECZNY KASPER for Appellees City of Chicago, Karlo Flowers and Sydney Roberts. Additional Parties: BRANDON CRASE. [4] [7146996] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1431] [4] [7146996] [21-1431]--[Edited 03/12/2021 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Kasper, Myriam) [Entered: 03/12/2021 12:09 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7146540] DW [3] [7146540] [21-1431] (ER) [Entered: 03/10/2021 03:21 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: James Murphy Aguilu, Brandon Crase, Roberta Lynch, Civilian Office of Police Account, Steve Kasperki, Lloyd C. Marshall, Mike Newman, Marshall Lynch, Local 3477, Lee Saunders, Sharon Throw KocJennifer Nunez, William PattersonAvik Das, Cook County Juvenile Probation and Kate Gailbraith Verrant. [2] [7146457] [21-1431] (AD) [Entered: 03/10/2021 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/23/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jason Smith I by 03/15/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/23/2021 for Appellant Jason Smith I. [1] [7146450] [21-1431] (AD) [Entered: 03/10/2021 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
