Toni Fly v. Frederick Entzel
| TONI FLY, also known as WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY |
| FREDERICK ENTZEL |
| 21-1495 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Toni Fly for court to acknowledge receipt of all submitted legal documents due to bad faith conduct. [14] [7161185] [21-1495] (CAH) [Entered: 05/18/2021 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellant Toni Fly to 05/03/2021 motion filed by Appellees. [13][7161143] [21-1495] (CAH) [Entered: 05/18/2021 03:54 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER re: Emergency motion for leave to transfer custody pending review. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23(a), respondent-appellee is authorized to transfer appellant Toni Fly to another Bureau of Prisons facility. When Fly is transferred, the appellee shall notify this court so that Flys new custodian can be substituted as the proper respondent-appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 43. TDK [12] [7158089] [21-1495] (AG) [Entered: 05/04/2021 03:44 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Prose motion filed by Appellant Toni Fly to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, per order. [11] [7157930] [21-1495] (AD) [Entered: 05/04/2021 12:27 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Motion; Affidavit; and Notice; and Request. [ # 8 ] The motion is GRANTED in part only to the extent that the clerk of this court shall send appellant a copy of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Further, to the extent appellants motion seeks any additional relief it is DENIED. The court trusts that the appellants custodian will provide reasonable access to the items appellant needs to prepare court-ordered filings. Appellants motion also appears to be a response to this courts April 13, 2021, order directing appellant to file a memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district courts decision. Accordingly, this court will consider appellants motion as a response to its April 13 order, but to the extent appellant wishes to file any additional explanation she may do so by June 3, 2021. Finally, the clerk of this court shall docket page 15 of this motion as appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. TDK [10] [7157928] [21-1495] (AD) [Entered: 05/04/2021 12:20 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Motion filed by Appellee Frederick Entzel for Leave to Transfer Custody Pending Review (Emergency Motion). [9] [7157626] [21-1495] (Simpson, W.) [Entered: 05/03/2021 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Toni Fly for injunctive relief. [8] [7157411] [21-1495] (CAH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Toni Fly. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7157410] [21-1495] (CAH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Toni Fly. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7156549] [21-1495] (PNR) [Entered: 04/27/2021 01:05 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Toni Fly shall have thirty days from the date at the top of this order to file a memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district court's decision. The court further reminds Fly of the obligation to comply with any prior orders and notices. Briefing in this case is otherwise suspended pending further order of the court. Memorandum due for Appellant Toni Fly 05/13/2021. MPB. [5] [7153700] [21-1495]--[Edited 04/14/2021 by ZNS] (ZNS) [Entered: 04/13/2021 01:40 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Toni Fly leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/08/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/10/2021 for Appellant Toni Fly [7152810] [4] [7152810] [21-1495] (AP) [Entered: 04/08/2021 04:01 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Toni Fly is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Toni Fly by 04/21/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 1550 0001 1563. [3] [7152325] [21-1495] (AD) [Entered: 04/07/2021 08:56 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney W. Scott Simpson for Appellee Frederick Entzel. [2] [7149224] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1495] [Edited 03/23/2021 by AG to reflect termination and addition of counsel] (Simpson, W.) [Entered: 03/23/2021 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Toni Fly by 03/29/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/05/2021 for Appellant Toni Fly. Transcript information sheet due by 04/05/2021. [1] [7149138] [21-1495] (MM) [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Toni Fly v. Frederick Entzel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: TONI FLY, also known as WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY | |
| Represented By: | Toni Fly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: FREDERICK ENTZEL | |
| Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
