Michael O'Grady v. City of Portage, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PORTAGE, DAWN WILCOX, PORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, MARIE MOE and KEVIN TODRYK
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL O'GRADY
Case Number: 21-1529
Filed: March 26, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 24, 2022 Michael O'Grady v. City of Portage

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: On consideration of the motion to consolidate appeals filed by appellant on May 18, 2021, appellees shall file, on or before May 27, 2021, a response to appellants motion. DW [15] [7161586] [21-1529] (AD) [Entered: 05/19/2021 04:26 PM]
May 18, 2021 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael O'Grady in 20-3357, 21-1529, 21-1530 to consolidate cases. [14] [7161183] [20-3357, 21-1529, 21-1530] (CM) [Entered: 05/18/2021 04:18 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 13 Filed Response by Appellees City of Portage, Marie Moe, Portage Community Schools, Kevin Todryk, Dawn Wilcox and Appellant Michael O'Grady to Plaintiff-Appellant's Amended Jurisdictional Memorandum. [13][7158002] [21-1529] (Tierney, Danielle) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:43 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 12 Filed Certificate of Service to Dkt #11 - Appearance & Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement filed on 05/04/2021 by Appellees City of Portage, Marie Moe, Kevin Todryk and Dawn Wilcox. [12] [7157823] [21-1529] (Engelke, Kyle) [Entered: 05/04/2021 10:16 AM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 11 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Kyle W. Engelke for Appellees City of Portage, Marie Moe, Kevin Todryk and Dawn Wilcox. [11] [7157815] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1529] [Edited 05/04/2021 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Engelke, Kyle) [Entered: 05/04/2021 09:58 AM]
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Appellant's motion to enlarge the time for filing his brief an additional 40 days from May 5, 2021 until June 15, 2021. [ # 9 ] To the extent the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Briefing in this appeal has been suspended pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue raised in this court's order dated March 29, 2021. The appellant may renew his motion should this appeal proceed to briefing on the merits. CMD [10] [7157210] [21-1529] (CG) [Entered: 04/30/2021 08:44 AM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael O'Grady to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7157148] [21-1529] (DRS) [Entered: 04/29/2021 03:04 PM]
April 20, 2021 Filing 8 Amended Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Michael O'Grady. [8] [7155194] [21-1529] (CM) [Entered: 04/20/2021 03:19 PM]
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: 1. Defendants-Appellees' Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule, filed in appeal No. 21-1529. 2. Defendants-Appellees Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule, filed in appeal No. 21-1530. [ # 6 ] [ # 7154662-2 ] The motions are GRANTED to the extent that the appellees response to the appellants jurisdictional memorandum is due by 05/06/2021. CMD [7] [7154776] [21-1529, 21-1530] (MM) [Entered: 04/19/2021 12:35 PM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellees City of Portage, Marie Moe, Portage Community Schools, Kevin Todryk, Dawn Wilcox and Appellant Michael O'Grady in 21-1529, Appellees City of Portage, Columbia County, Vern Gove, Mark Baruch Hazelbaker, Portage Community Schools and Appellant Michael O'Grady in 21-1530 to extend time to file appellee brief. modify briefing schedule. [6] [7154664] [21-1529, 21-1530]--[Edited 04/19/2021 by MM to reflect document title.] (Tierney, Danielle) [Entered: 04/19/2021 09:08 AM]
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on April 12, 2021. [ # 4 ] Appellees shall file, on or before April 22, 2021, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 29, 2021. DW [5] [7154025] [21-1529] (PS) [Entered: 04/14/2021 03:37 PM]
April 12, 2021 Filing 4 Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by Appellant Michael O'Grady. [4] [7153500] [21-1529] (MAN) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:17 PM]
April 7, 2021 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees City of Portage, Marie Moe, Portage Community Schools, Kevin Todryk and Dawn Wilcox. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-3357. No. [3] [7152492] [21-1529] --[Edited 04/08/2021 by MM to reflect related case referenced in statement.] (Simatic, Kurt) [Entered: 04/07/2021 02:39 PM]
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant, on or before April 12, 2021, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the district courts March 12, 2021 text order. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7150521] DW [2] [7150521] [21-1529] (AP) [Entered: 03/29/2021 03:52 PM]
March 26, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/09/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/05/2021 for Michael O'Grady. [1] [7150112] [21-1529] (ER) [Entered: 03/26/2021 02:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael O'Grady v. City of Portage, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF PORTAGE
Represented By: Kurt M. Simatic
Represented By: Kyle W. Engelke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAWN WILCOX
Represented By: Kurt M. Simatic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
Represented By: Danielle Baudhuin Tierney
Represented By: Kyle W. Engelke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARIE MOE
Represented By: Kurt M. Simatic
Represented By: Kyle W. Engelke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEVIN TODRYK
Represented By: Kurt M. Simatic
Represented By: Kyle W. Engelke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL O'GRADY
Represented By: Michael O'Grady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?