Kevin Martin v. Ashlynn Ledford
| KEVIN L. MARTIN |
| ASHLYNN LEDFORD |
| 21-1550 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The pro se appellant was DENIED leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis by the appellate court on 04/15/2021 and was given 14 days to pay the $505 filing fee. The pro se appellant has not paid the $505 appellate fee.[6][7159739] [21-1550] (CM) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:36 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 05/12/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7159742-2] [7159742] [21-1550] (CM) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:43 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Declaration in support of motion to proceed in forma paupeis, filed on 4/12/2021. Kevin Martin is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because, on three or more prior occasions, he brought an action that was dismissed on the grounds that it was frivolous or failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See Martin v. Ledford, No. 20-2022 (Aug. 25, 2020). In this case, Martin has not demonstrated imminent danger of a serious physical injury pursuant to 1915(g). See Taylor v. Watkins, 623 F.3d 483 (7th Cir. 2010); Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Martin shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7016 0340 0001 1334 7431. [ # 3 ] [5] [7154265] MWR [21-1550] (FP) [Entered: 04/15/2021 01:02 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Aaron T. Craft for Appellee Ashlynn Ledford. [4] [7153541] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1550] -[Edited 04/13/2021 by AG to reflect termination and addition of counsel] (Craft, Aaron) [Entered: 04/13/2021 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin L. Martin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7153506] [21-1550] (MAN) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/13/2021 [2][7150746] [21-1550] (AP) [Entered: 03/30/2021 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/13/2021. [1] [7150741] [21-1550] (AP) [Entered: 03/30/2021 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kevin Martin v. Ashlynn Ledford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN L. MARTIN | |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ASHLYNN LEDFORD | |
| Represented By: | Archer Riddick Randall Rose |
| Represented By: | Aaron T. Craft |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
