Michael Pietila v. Keith Immerfall, et al
| ANN YORK, PATRICK GORMAN, MICHAEL A. CLARK, BRIAN SCHMIDT, KEITH IMMERFALL, Sergeant, GRANT ROPER and JIMMY MUTCHIE |
| MICHAEL S. PIETILA |
| 21-1751 |
| April 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[5][7168897] [21-1751] (DRS) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:09 PM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/24/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7168913-2] [7168913] [21-1751] (DRS) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Kevin L. Grzebielski for Ann York, Brian Schmidt, Grant Roper, Jimmy Mutchie, Keith Immerfall, Patrick Gorman and Michael A. Clark in 21-1751 terminated and added Attorney(s) Jody J. Schmelzer for party(s) Appellee Michael A. Clark Appellee Grant Roper Appellee Jimmy Mutchie Appellee Ann York Appellee Patrick Gorman Appellee Keith Immerfall Appellee Brian Schmidt, in case 21-1751 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Jody J. Schmelzer for Appellees Keith Immerfall, Patrick Gorman, Jimmy Mutchie, Grant Roper, Brian Schmidt and Ann York. [4] [7163678] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1751]--[Edited 05/28/2021 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 05/28/2021 02:07 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER re: Appellant's Pro Se May 18, 2021 Motion. [ # 2 ] The appellant has asked the court to dismiss this appeal, citing that he cannot afford the filing fees. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) allows an appellant to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. However, voluntary dismissal does not relieve the appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). Because it appears that the appellant would like to be relieved of the obligation to pay the appellate fees, the motion is DENIED. Should the appellant decide that he does not want to proceed with this appeal, he may file a renewed motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any such motion is due by June 4, 2021. [3] [7161440] CMD [21-1751] (AD) [Entered: 05/19/2021 02:25 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael S. Pietila to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [2] [7161172] [21-1751] (CM) [Entered: 05/18/2021 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael S. Pietila by 05/04/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/27/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 05/11/2021. [1] [7156780] [21-1751] (MM) [Entered: 04/28/2021 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.