Dylan Mitchell, et al v. Eugene Doherty, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAYNA SCHULTZ, LARISSA WALSTON, IVAN HOLLAND, DYLAN MITCHELL and MICHAEL RIGGS
Defendant / Appellee: EUGENE G. DOHERTY, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS and GARY CARUANA
Case Number: 21-1764
Filed: April 29, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 22, 2022 Summary Mitchell v. Doherty

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 07/13/2021 for Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. Appellees' brief due on or before 08/13/2021 for Gary Caruana, Eugene G. Doherty and Winnebago County, Illinois. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/03/2021 for Appellants Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. JNS [7165174] [21-1764] (ZNS) [Entered: 06/07/2021 09:03 AM]
May 17, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. [10] [7160676] [21-1764] (AD) [Entered: 05/17/2021 11:12 AM]
May 13, 2021 Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Adele D. Nicholas for Appellants Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. for Jaylen Butler, Andrew Ehrhardt. [9] [7160215] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-1764] (Nicholas, Adele) [Entered: 05/13/2021 03:16 PM]
May 13, 2021 Filing 8 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN WRONG CASE. THIS MOTION WAS REDOCKETED INTO APPEAL NO. 19-1411. Motion filed by Appellee Eugene G. Doherty to dismiss case. [8] [7160183] [21-1764]--[Edited 05/13/2021 by CMD] (Sheffield, Jonathan) [Entered: 05/13/2021 02:29 PM]
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order issued A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7158921] DW [7] [7158921] [21-1764] (AD) [Entered: 05/07/2021 12:20 PM]
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 07/06/2021 for Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. Appellees' briefs due on or before 08/05/2021 for Gary Caruana, Eugene G. Doherty and Winnebago County, Illinois. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/26/2021 for Appellants Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. JNS [7158781] [21-1764] (ER) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:06 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Friday, June 4, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [5] [7158774] [21-1764] (ER) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:01 AM]
May 6, 2021 Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jonathan J Sheffield for Appellee Eugene G. Doherty. [4] [7158649] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-1764] [4] [7158649] [21-1764]--[Edited 05/06/2021 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Sheffield, Jonathan) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:55 PM]
April 30, 2021 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joshua G. Vincent for Appellees Gary Caruana and Winnebago County, Illinois. [3] [7157457] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-1764]--[Edited 05/03/2021 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Vincent, Joshua) [Entered: 04/30/2021 04:57 PM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLANTS: Ross Wagner, Andrew Ehrhardt and Jaylen Butler. [2] [7157328] [21-1764] (ER) [Entered: 04/30/2021 11:59 AM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/13/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/08/2021 for Ivan Holland, Dylan Mitchell, Michael Riggs, Dayna Schultz and Larissa Walston. [1] [7157327] [21-1764] (ER) [Entered: 04/30/2021 11:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dylan Mitchell, et al v. Eugene Doherty, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAYNA SCHULTZ
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Adele D. Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LARISSA WALSTON
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Adele D. Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: IVAN HOLLAND
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Adele D. Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DYLAN MITCHELL
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Adele D. Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL RIGGS
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Adele D. Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EUGENE G. DOHERTY
Represented By: Jonathan Joseph Sheffield Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Represented By: Joshua G. Vincent
Represented By: Michael F. Iasparro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GARY CARUANA
Represented By: Joshua G. Vincent
Represented By: Michael F. Iasparro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?